Skip to main content

Seed germination prediction of Salvia limbata under ecological stresses in protected areas: an artificial intelligence modeling approach

Abstract

Background

Salvia is a large, diverse, and polymorphous genus of the family Lamiaceae, comprising about 900 ornamentals, medicinal species with almost cosmopolitan distribution in the world. The success of Salvia limbata seed germination depends on a numerous ecological factors and stresses. We aimed to analyze Salvia limbata seed germination under four ecological stresses of salinity, drought, temperature and pH, with application of artificial intelligence modeling techniques such as MLR (Multiple Linear Regression), and MLP (Multi-Layer Perceptron). The S.limbata seeds germination was tested in different combinations of abiotic conditions. Five different temperatures of 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 °C, seven drought treatments of 0, −2, −4, −6, −8, −10 and −12 bars, eight treatments of salinity containing 0, 50, 100.150, 200, 250, 300 and 350 mM of NaCl, and six pH treatments of 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 were tested. Indeed 228 combinations were tested to determine the percentage of germination for model development.

Results

Comparing to the MLR, the MLP model represents the significant value of R2 in training (0.95), validation (0.92) and test data sets (0.93). According to the results of sensitivity analysis, the values of drought, salinity, pH and temperature are respectively known as the most significant variables influencing S. limbata seed germination. Areas with high moisture content and low salinity in the soil have a high potential to seed germination of S. limbata. Also, the temperature of 18.3 °C and pH of 7.7 are proposed for achieving the maximum number of germinated S. limbata seeds.

Conclusions

Multilayer perceptron model helps managers to determine the success of S.limbata seed planting in agricultural or natural ecosystems. The designed graphical user interface is an environmental decision support system tool for agriculture or rangeland managers to predict the success of S.limbata seed germination (percentage) in different ecological constraints of lands.

Background

Salvia is a large, diverse, and polymorphous genus of the family Lamiaceae, comprising about 900 ornamentals, medicinal species with almost cosmopolitan distribution in the world [1,2,3]. In fact, 58 species of this genus are found in Iran as 17 species are endemic [4, 5]. Some species of the genus, e.g., Salvia officinalis, possess economic importance as flavoring agents in perfumery, seasoning and cosmetology. S. limbata has been credited with a long list of medicinal uses: spasmolytic, antiseptic, astringent, antibiotic, creaminess, liver stimulant and digestive enhancer as some of the phenolic compounds of plants belonging to this genus, have also shown excellent antimicrobial activity [6,7,8,9].

In Iran, Salvia limbata is highly endangered under over grazing and exploitation by local people and the climate changes phenomena. Salvia limbata is widely used in traditional medicine for its therapeutic effects. The success of seed germination is one of the main economic and ecological solutions to preserve the medicinal plants such as Salvia limbata. However, the success of seed germination depends on a numerous ecological factors and stresses such as salinity stress [10, 11], drought stress [12, 13], temperature [14, 15], and pH [11, 12]. Salinity, as an abiotic ecological factor, limits crops production and the chance of seed germination [16]. Water absorbency will be diminished under salinity stress in which several metabolic and physiological processes are influenced and the duration of seed germination is prolonged [17]. Temperature, with affecting the enzymatic activity, highly influences seed germination and determine the periodicity of seed germination [18, 19]. Researchers [18, 20, 21] believe that germination rate increases when temperature meets an optimal level, and then it declines sharply. Other factors such as drought and pH also affect seed germination in many species [22, 23].

Quantitative knowledge of the salinity stress, drought stress, temperature and pH that influences Salvia limbata seed germination is scarce. Most of the researches have been focused on regression models in prediction of seed germination under temperature [12, 20, 24, 25] and drought stresses [26, 27]. In other researches thermal time models are common methods to determine the seed germination rate under ecological stresses [28]. In thermal time models, seeds should accumulate thermal-time unit which is commonly degree-days, for a percentage of the population to germinate. In below optimum temperature, seeds germination rate starts to decrease and above optimum temperature seeds germination rate increases linearly with temperature [28]. Recent researches commonly developed hydrothermal models in seed germination of agricultural or wild species using linear or non-linear regression models [29,30,31,32]. These models determine base, optimum and maximum ecological conditions for seed germination. For instance, Duarte et al. [28] determined the thermal time requirement for seed germination for bromeliads during different climatic periods. Base time from 6.2 to 10 °C and ceiling time from 31.6 to 41.7 °C were identified, depending on the species. In other thermal time study, Galindez et al. [33] applied thermal time model combined with darkness to assess germination base temperature in photoblastic seeds of three aromatic–medicinal Verbenaceae species in genera Lippia and Aloysia. The results revealed that some species seed germination only occur in light conditions, while seed germination in some other species, was significantly more successful in the light than in darkness. Indeed, in these models, researchers treated seeds with at most two ecological factors such as water and temperature (hydrothermal model) or light and temperature (light-thermal model). New artificial neural network models have potential to test multiple ecological conditions or stresses on seed germination simultaneously to determine the results of different combinations of ecological stresses on seed germination rate.

Recently, artificial intelligence techniques such as Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) neural network, as nonlinear and dynamic modeling techniques, have been employed for the development of accurate models in environmental sciences [34,35,36]. The new quantitative modeling methods and artificial intelligence approach are essential to deal with ecological phenomena [37, 38] such as seed germination. MLP modeling technique has been developed based on the structure of the human brain in data processing. A variety of mathematical functions have been applied in artificial intelligence modeling techniques to increase the ability of model in output prediction. For example, Jahani [35] proved that artificial neural network with multi-layer perceptron predicts the quality of forest landscapes with high accuracy in comparison with multiple regression models. In this research we aimed to analyze Salvia limbata seed germination under four ecological stresses of salinity, drought, temperature and pH, with application of artificial intelligence modeling techniques such as MLR, and MLP. The sensitivity of the most accurate model will prioritize ecological factors in Salvia limbata seed germination. Finally, the Graphical User Interface (GUI) tool as an environmental decision support system will be provided for ecologists to predict the percentage of seed germination of Salvia limbata in the field.

Results

In this research, two predictive models which are multiple regression and ANN model were investigated to compare results in S. limbata seed germination.

Multiple linear regression model (MLR)

To avoid limitation in model generalization, 80% of total samples (228 treatments) were selected randomly for multiple regression modeling and the resulted statistical indices have been presented in Table 1. The remained samples (46 treatments = 20%) were applied to test the result of regression equation (Eq. 8) and detecting the generalization potential of regression equation. Regression equation was applied to predict the seed germination in test data.

Table 1 Statistical indices of MLR model in training and test sets
$$\varvec{PSG} = 3.139 \times D - 0.077 \times S + 0.065 \times {\text{T}} + 0.325 \times {\text{P}} + 42.739$$
(8)

In Eq. 8, PSG is the percentage of seed germination, D is drought, S is salinity, T is temperature and P is pH.

The results of MLR model’s accuracy in training and test samples have been summarized in Table 1 by R2, MSE, RMSE and MAE indices. The correlation of MLR outputs and target seed germination has been illustrated in Figs. 1, 2 and 3 using linear regression model.

Fig. 1
figure1

The scatter plot of target versus predicted seed germination by MLR in train data set

Fig. 2
figure2

The scatter plot of target versus predicted seed germination by MLR in test data set

Fig. 3
figure3

The scatter plot of target versus predicted seed germination by MLR in All data set

MLP modeling

The abiotic influential variables, as input variables, and S.limbata seed germination as outputs, were summarized in the MATLAB R2018b software to design the most accurate structure of MLP. The 228 treatments were used to train the feed forward neural networks. The recorded data contain 4 influential variables as input data sets in designed MLP and seed germination as output data sets.

The structure of optimized MLP was obtained using determination of the activation function, the number of hidden layers and its’ neurons and the most accurate predictive model has been achieved by the MLP technique (Table 2).

Table 2 The performance measures of the best MLPs in test phase

According to the values of R2 (Table 2), the structure of “4-10-10-1″ was defined as the optimized MLP model and the most successful topology in the seed germination prediction of S.limbata. The defined topology includes four ecological parameters as inputs, 10 neurons in the structure of hidden layers and 1 neuron to calculate the percentage of seed germination in the output layer. As we found, the logarithm sigmoid is the most successful function in hidden layer and linear transfer function is the most proper function in output layer to achieve the most accurate seed germination prediction.

The scatter plot will be applicable to illustrate correlation between variables [41, 42, 55]. The scatter plot in Fig. 4 illustrates the differences between outputs of MLP model and target seed germination in four data sets. The value of coefficient determination reveals a significant correlation between target seed germination and MLP outputs.

Fig. 4
figure4

Scatter plots of output versus target seed germination values by MLP

Figure 5 compares the real and simulated values of seed germination percentage in the training, validation, test and all data. A meaningful and distinctive agreement between target and simulated values is illustrated in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure5

Target and simulated seed germination values by MLP

Considering results of different designed structure of ANNs, MLP model with significant value of R2, makes more accurate correlation between inputs and outputs. So, S.limbata seed germination model, using of 4 abiotic variables, as model input variables, can be more accurate model for S.limbata seed germination prediction. The Eq. 9 is proposed as S.limbata seed germination model.

$${\text{MLP}} = purelin\left\{ {logsig\left\{ {\sum LW_{2,1} \left\{ {logsig\left( {\sum IW_{1,1pi} + b_{1} } \right)} \right\} + b_{2} } \right\}} \right\}.$$
(9)

where, MLP: Multi-layer perceptron model, pi: inputs signals, LWji: layer weights, IWji: indicates the input weights, ∑bi: represents the biases, i is the neuron number and j is layer number.

As the results reveal, MLP model (R2 = 0.94) is more accurate than MLR (R2 = 0.67). Therefore we focus on the analysis of MLP model for model variables prioritization.

Sensitivity analysis of MLP

For sensitivity analysis of the most accurate model, which is MLP model, each input variable was withdrawn while not manipulating any of the other variables and then the MLP model was trained for every pattern. According to results in Fig. 6, the share of each input variable of developed MLP on desired output can be realized clearly. According to sensitivity analysis, the values of drought, salinity, pH and temperature are known as the most significant variables which influence S. limbata seed germination (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure6

The results of sensitivity analysis of MLP

Considering trends in the Fig. 7(a), drought, is negatively correlated to seed germination, so in the ecosystems under drought stress, the percentage of S. limbata seed germination obviously decreases. Actually, the percentage of S. limbata seed germination will increase with reduction of site drought and it is happened in drought lower than −8 bars. Considering trends in the Fig. 7(b), salinity, is negatively correlated to seed germination, so in the ecosystems under salinity stress, the percentage of S. limbata seed germination obviously decreases. Actually, the percentage of S. limbata seed germination will reduce with increase of site salinity and it is happened when salinity is more than 50 millimols. The impact of pH and temperature on S. limbata seed germination is very limited. However, considering trend in the Fig. 7(c), pH has an optimum value for the maximum of seed germination. Indeed, the maximum of seed germination is in 7.7 pH. On the other hand, trend in the Fig. 7(d) reveals that the temperature has a maximum value for seed germination and after 18.3 °C, the percentage of seed germination decreases.

Fig. 7
figure7

MLP Output for inputs variables

At the end, a graphical user interface (GUI) was designed to run the MLP model on new data when the natural resources managers are planning for S.limbata seed planting. The manager can easily predict the percentage of seed germination under abiotic ecological stresses. GUI as an EDSS tool will be run on new data just by pushing the “Seed Germination Prediction” button in Fig. 8. As an example, Fig. 8 illustrates the results of seed germination under four ecological conditions (drought, salinity, temperature and pH).

Fig. 8
figure8

Seed germination prediction under four ecological conditions

Discussion

The MLP model, which has been developed in this research resulted a proper description of the S. limbata germination dynamics in response to drought, salinity, temperature and pH. The results also provided mathematical tool to predict the percentage of seed germination under ecological abiotic stresses that has not been addressed previously. The ANN modeling approach that we applied in this research not only inherited the advantages of previous models (e.g. 24, 20, 25, 12, 56), but also included new artificial intelligence technique and some additional features as discussed below.

We compared MLR and ANN modeling techniques and we found that MLP model consistently provided better prediction of seed germination, whereas the classic models, such as MLR, was systematically biased and inaccurate [30, 35]. The results proved that MLP model (R2 = 0.94) is definitely more accurate than MLR (R2 = 0.67). The main application of MLP model is in S. limbata seed germination prediction based on abiotic stresses. As an environmental decision support system tool, MLP is applied for decision making of site rehabilitation in rangelands to increase the possibility of S. limbata seed germination. The ANN technique may be easily extended to other species, to accommodate different seed germination scheme observed in other regions or ecosystems. In a recent research, Mesgaran et al. [15] introduce a new hydrothermal time model that uses a log-logistic distribution to discover the optimum temperature changes for seed germination in respond to the water potential. They proved that optimal temperature gently decreased with reduction in water potential and log-logistic model resulted good fits to germination data. However they did not compare the results of log-logistic model with new ANN modeling techniques. We believe that MLP model can discover the relationship between ecological conditions (such as temperature and water potential in Mesgaran et al. [15]) to predict the success of seed planting. Actually, thermal-time models make an attempt to determine the base, optimum and ceiling germination in degree-days; while ecological condition tests are limited to one or two factors (refer to 29, 30, 31, 32, 28, 33]. On the other hand, ANN model in this research formulates the rate of germination under multiple ecological stress condition but there is a shortcoming in determination of base, optimum and ceiling germination degree-days. Hence, in future studies, the combination of thermal-time models and ANN models would result more accurate hybrid model which is able to determine the base, optimum and ceiling germination in multiple-stress-days. In our work, germination was described in totals, but only after 15 days (extended to 30 days after last germination). Yet, our understanding of thermal models, in which thresholds and rate of parameters are defined, tells us that beyond the optima germination becomes slower and slower. This means that under stress, 15 days of germination testing is likely insufficient to know if germination may have occurred in time, e.g. at lower temperatures. Indeed, this is the caveats associated with this particular dataset and should be considered in future work especially in suggested hybrid models of ANN and thermal models.

The results of sensitivity analysis revealed that drought and salinity are considered as the most influential factors in S. limbata seed germination rate; indeed, seed germination increases with the reduction of drought and salinity. Gorai et al. [57] researches also proved that the maximum of Salvia aegyptiaca seed germination is at 0 milli mol NaCl; and seed germination will be inhibited with the increase of salinity. Gorai et al. [57] determined 30 °C as the optimum temperature for Salvia aegyptiaca seed germination, but we determined 18.3 °C as the optimum temperature for S. limbata seed germination. Belmehdi et al. [11] determined the optimum temperature between 15 and 20 °C for Origanum elongatum (one of the Lamiaceae family species) seeds germination. This result is so close to the achieved optimum temperature for S. limbata seeds germination at 18.3 °C in this research. On the other hand, Belmehdi et al. [11] mentioned that the optimum pH for Origanum elongatum seeds germination is between 6 and 7, while the optimum pH for S. limbata seeds germination is 7.7 in our results. Indeed, Belmehdi et al. [11] used statistical analysis (without modeling approaches) to find the optimum value of variables influencing seed germination; hence they achieved a range of values. As we modeled the seed germination by combined ecological variables, we achieved the trends of germination changes in respond to the influential variables and more crisp values were discovered.

In proposed hydrothermal time models, the researchers combine two abiotic factors to determine the effect of temperature and water potential on seed germination; but, as an advantage of ANN modeling, we combined four ecological factors to predict the percentage of seed germination. The second advantage of our research is in designed GUI tool for user application as an environmental decision support system such as the research of Bahraminejad et al. [59]. Indeed, using designed GUI, the agriculture or natural resources managers will be able to predict the percentage of S.limbata seeds germination under ecological constraints.

Conclusion

In this study, a multilayer perceptron model was developed to predict the seed germination of S. limbata species under four ecological stresses, which helps managers to determine the success of S. limbata seed planting in agricultural or natural ecosystems. By using the MATLAB 2018 software, it is possible to implement the model in the regions where the ecological stresses are as the same as the tested variables in this research. Areas with high moisture content and low salinity in the soil have a high potential to seed germination of S. limbata. Also, the temperature of 18.3 °C and pH of 7.7 are proposed for achieving the maximum number of germinated S. limbata seeds.

Methods

Seeds collection and preparation

Mature seeds were collected in August 2019 from South Alborz protected area in Alborz province in the north of Iran (35° 44′ N to 36° 35′ N and 51° 00′ E to 51° 36′ E). Seeds were carefully gathered from mature Salvia limbata species. The seeds were sorted manually to avoid any ruined or injured seeds. The gathered seeds have not undergone any treatment. Indeed, the conservation was made in until their use. Indeed, germination tests were performed after 2 weeks and as Duarte et al. [28] proposed, seeds were maintained in dark and dry tubes at room temperature (25 ± 3 °C) until eventual use.

No permissions were required to collect seeds from the studied area because seeds were collected under supervision of provincial Department of Environment. There is no committee/review board or regional/national committee to approve the study; however any field study in protected areas is under supervision of provincial Department of Environment.

Germination experiments

In order to determine the impact of different abiotic variables on S.limbata seed germination, a variety of parameters were studied, modeled and discussed in this research. The experiments, in different abiotic conditions, were run in sterilized petri dishes under controlled lab condition. Such as other researches (e.g. Porceddu et al. 2017), germination was defined as visible radicle emergence.

Germination percentage (%) was defined as the Eq 1 which is the ratio between germinated seeds and the total seeds.

$$R = \frac{n}{N} \times 100$$
(1)

In Eq 1, R is the germination percentage (%), n represents the number of germinated seeds, and N is total of seeds in the experiment [58].

In pretests, we tested seed germination in all ecological stresses one by one. Pretests revealed that the maximum time for S.limbata seeds germination equals 15 days. Indeed after 15 days the remained seeds begin to rot and will not germinate any more. However, in the main research tests we continued lab tests for 30 days but we did not find any new germination after day 15. As Porceddu et al. [39] proposed, a cut-test was performed to determine the viability of the ingeminated seeds and we considered soft seeds as non-viable ones.

Seeds were drowned in sodium hypochlorite solution for 1 min to be sterilized and avoid fungus attack. Before being used in the experiment, the seeds were washed with distilled water and then air-dried. The experiments were conducted in Petri dishes containing two disks of Whatman ilter paper which have been soaked with 1.5 ml of distilled water.

The S. limbata seeds germination was tested in different combinations of abiotic conditions containing temperature, drought, salinity, and pH. To control the effect of light, S. limbata seeds were incubated at light in illuminated incubator at 16/8 h photoperiod. Five different temperatures were tested which were 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 °C to evaluate the effect of temperature on seed germination. The drought stress was tested using polyethylene glycol 6000 with seven treatments which were 0, −2, −4, −6, −8, −10 and −12 bars. Salinity stress was evaluated in eight treatments of salinity containing 0, 50, 100.150, 200, 250, 300 and 350 mM of NaCl to investigate the impact of salinity stress on germination. In order to test the effect of pH, six treatments of pH were investigated consisting of 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. S.limbata seeds were cultured in different combinations of abiotic conditions randomly. Indeed 228 combinations were tested to determine the percentage of germination for model development.

Multiple regression analysis

Four independent variables, consisting of temperature, drought, salinity, and pH, were used to predict S. limbata seed germination. To avoid any possible bias in the selection of test set individuals, the total samples (228 treatments) were randomly divided into two subsets. Training data subset contains 80% of total samples (182 treatments), and test data subset contains 20% of total samples (46 treatments).

Multi-layer perceptron neural network

The structure of MLP is based on the human brain by using some interconnected processing elements (PEs) or neurons. MLP learns the relations between variables (temperature, drought, salinity, and pH) and outputs (the percentage of seed germination) by the training samples. A transfer function, in the neurons, summarizes the weighted variables to predict the output while inputs of the neurons are ecosystem variables and output is the dependent target [40,41,42]. Indeed, the weighted input variables of each neuron are connected to other neurons variables. Using a learning algorithm, the weights of variables in hidden layers are adjusted continuously to minimize the differences between target and network output values. In this research, we applied four most popular activation functions which are hyperbolic tangent, logarithmic sigmoid, sigmoid tangent and linear transfer functions to optimize the performance of MLP. Back Propagation (BP) method is commonly used in the learning process to adjust the optimum weights and biases of neurons [34, 35, 43].

BP method aims to calculate the differences between predicted (MLP output) and target (the recorded percentage of seed germination) values for diminishing these errors. The weight of neurons (w) and input variables (x) play a main role in the observed errors, so we need to justify these parameters to reduce the differences between predicted and target values. Thus, the weights of the ith variable in jth neuron are changing continuously during training process. For the weights adjusting, the output of jth neuron on the kth hidden layer (\(net_{j}^{k}\)) should be calculated by Eq. 2 (refer to Demuth and Beale [44]).

$$\varvec{net}_{\varvec{j}}^{\varvec{k}} = \mathop \sum \limits_{{\varvec{i} = 0}}^{\varvec{n}} \varvec{w}_{{\varvec{ji}}} \varvec{x}_{{\varvec{ji}}}$$
(2)

In the next step, some transfer functions (∫), such as linear, sigmoid tangent, hyperbolic tangent, and logarithm sigmoid, are used in the structure of hidden layers and neurons output is calculated using Eq. 3. The transfer function selection is based on trial and errors to find the most accurate model and optimizing the outputs (refer to Demuth and Beale [44]).

$$\varvec{Y}_{{\varvec{net}}} = \smallint \varvec{net}_{\varvec{j}}$$
(3)

In this research, the weights of 228 samples will be adjusted by delta rule which has been summarized in Eq. 4. In Eq. 4, “E” is the sum of squared errors between predicted and target values, wji represent the weight of ith neuron in jth hidden layer, and γ is learning rate which is determined by a crisp value. All the weights in the hidden layers will be changed to achieve the minimum of the errors in outputs (refer to Demuth and Beale [44]).

$$\varvec{w}_{{\varvec{ji}}}^{\varvec{t}} = \varvec{w}_{{\varvec{ji}}}^{{\varvec{t} - 1}} + \left( { - \frac{{\partial \varvec{E}^{\varvec{t}} }}{{{}^{\gamma }\partial \varvec{w}_{{\varvec{ji}}}^{\varvec{t}} }}} \right)$$
(4)

As the errors reduce in training data set, the error of test data set may be increase and as a result, the model loses the capability of generalization which is called over training of the network. Therefore, the validation dataset are applied to control the overtraining of the MLP model. When the errors of network decrease during training process, while the errors of validation samples increase, the network training will be stopped. We divided the samples in three categories randomly which it means 60 percent of all treatments as training samples, 20 percent of all treatments as validation samples and 20 percent of all treatments as test samples. MATLAB 2018 is mathematical software which was used to design Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model and test the results.

Modeling S. limbata seed germination

In order to process the data, artificial neural network intelligent in MATLAB 2018 was implemented. In this research, in order to modeling the percentage of S. limbata seed germination, the selected influential variables including temperature, drought, salinity, and pH were recorded as independent variables (model input), and the percentage of S. limbata seed germination was considered as dependent variables (model output). To train the MLP model, the samples were randomly divided into three categories of training, validation and test data sets. Training data is used to create the optimal model and is evaluated with the validation data set. Finally, the data are used to measure the generalizability and applicability of the model to the new data and determine the actual accuracy of it [34, 45, 46]. To optimize the model accuracy, the number of hidden layers, the number of and activation functions were defined by trials and errors [47,48,49]. Model accuracy was estimated based on the following indices: coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean square error (MSE) (Eqs. 5 to 7 [50,51,52]).

$$MSE = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {O_{i} \,\text{ - }\,P_{i} } \right)^{2} } }}{n}$$
(5)
$$MAE = \frac{1}{n}\sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left| {\mathop O\nolimits_{i} - \mathop P\nolimits_{i} } \right|}$$
(6)
$$\mathop R\nolimits^{2} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {(\mathop O\nolimits_{i} - \mathop O\nolimits_{ave} )(\mathop P\nolimits_{i} - \mathop P\nolimits_{ave} )} }}{{\sqrt {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {(\mathop O\nolimits_{i} - \mathop O\nolimits_{ave} )\sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {(\mathop P\nolimits_{i} - \mathop P\nolimits_{ave} )} } } }}$$
(7)

In these equations: Oi: measured data, Pi: predicted data, Oave: mean measured data, Pave: the average of predicted data and n: number of the samples. Evaluation of the best fitting network to find the most accurate network structure was done by the above criteria which aim to maximize the coefficient of determination and minimize the mean squares of errors and mean squares of absolute error.

Each ecological variable has a particular role in the outputs value of the model [53, 54]. When we prioritize the importance of the variables, it is possible to justify the ecological variables to achieve the desired percentage of seed germination in the field. We designed a sensitivity analysis to determine the importance of each variable which influence the model output or S.limbata seed germination. To do this analysis, we calculated the standard deviation of each variable. Then, we changed each variable in the range of standard deviation to discover the occurring changes in model outputs. While a variable is changing in the range of standard deviation, other variables are fixed in the mean value to determine the sensitivity of model to target variable alone. The standard deviation of outputs, in respond to each variable changes, was tagged as sensitivity value for each variable (refer to Jahani et al. [41]).

Ultimately, the graphical user interface tool was developed as an environmental decision support system (EDSS) for prediction of S. limbata seed germination by agricultural or rangeland managers who are expecting the maximum percentage of S. limbata in the field.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ANN:

Artificial Neural Network

MLP:

Multi-Layer Perceptron

MLR:

Multiple Linear Regression

EDSS:

Environmental Decision Support System

BP:

Back Propagation

MSE:

Mean Squared Error

RMSE:

Root Mean Squared Error

MAE:

Mean Absolute Error

GUI:

Graphical User Interface

References

  1. 1.

    Hedge A, Salvia L. In: Rechinger, K. H. (ed.), Flora Iranica 150: 403–476. Akad. Druck-u. Verlagsan-stalt, Graz. 1982.

  2. 2.

    Heywood VH. Flowering Plants of the word. Oxford University Press. 1987. Rechinger KH. Flora Iranica. No. 150, Graz: Akademische Druck-U. Verlagsanstalt. 1982, P: 462.

  3. 3.

    Saffariha M, Azarnivand H, Zare Chahooki MA, Tavili A, Potter D. The effect of flowering on the quantity and quality of Salvia limbata in altitudes. Rang Water Manag. 2019;72:139–49.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Salimpour F, Mazooji A, Akhoondi Darzikolaei S. Chemotaxonomy of six Salvia species using essential oil composition markers. J Med Plants Res. 2011;5(9):1795–805.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rechinger KH. Salvia, Stachys, Scutellaria. Hymenocrater. In: Flora Iranica; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Esmaeili MA, Sonboli A, Kanani MR, Sadeghi H, Karimianpour N. Evaluation of the effect of Salvia sahendica on tissue damages induced by alcohol in oxidative stress conditions in the rat: effect on liver and kidney oxidative parameters. J Pharmaceutical. 2010;15(4):315–22.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kamatou GPP, Makunga NP, Ramogola WPN, Viljoen AM. South African Salvia species: a review of biological activities and phytochemistry. J Ethno Pharm. 2008;119(3):664–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jahani R, Khaledyan D, Jahani A, Jamshidi E, Kamalinejad M, Khoramjouy M, Faizi M. Evaluation and comparison of the antidepressant-like activity of Artemisia dracunculus and Stachys lavandulifolia ethanolic extracts: an in vivo study. J Res Pharm Sci. 2020;14(6):554–65.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kalantary S, Golbabaei F, Latifi M, Shokrgozar MA, Yaseri M. Assessment of electrospinning antioxidant nanofibers in skin exposure to oxidative stress. J Mazan Uni Med Sci. 2020;30(186):68–79.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Keshavarzi MHB. The effect of different NaCl concentration on germination and early seedling growth of Artemisia annua L. Inte J Agri Res Rev. 2012;2:135–40.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Belmehdi O, El Harsal A, Benmoussi M, Laghmouchi Y, Skali Senhaji N, Abrini J. Effect of light, temperature, salt stress and pH on seed germination of medicinal plant Origanum elongatum (Bonnet) Emb. & Maire. J. Bioca Agri Biotech. 2018. (In press): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.07.032.

  12. 12.

    Karimzadeh Soureshjani H, Bahador M, Tadayon MR, Ghorbani Dehkordi A. Modelling seed germination and seedling emergence of flax and sesame as affected by temperature, soil bulk density, and sowing depth. J Ind Crop Pro. 2019;141:111770.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Watt MS, Xub V, Bloomberg M. Development of a hydrothermal timeseed germination model which uses the Weibull distribution to describe basewater potential. Ecol Model. 2010;221:1267–72.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kurt O. A predictive model for the effects of temperature on the germination period of flax seeds (Linum usitatissimum L.). Turk J Agric For. 2012;36:654–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mesgaran MB, Onofri A, Mashhadi HR, Cousens RD. Water availability shifts the optimal temperatures for seedgermination: a modelling approach. J Eco Model. 2017;351:87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Koyro HW. Effect of salinity on growth, photosynthesis, water relations and solute composition of the potential cash crop halophyte Plantago coronpus (L.). Environ Exp Bot. 2006;56:136–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ramin AA. Effects of salinity and temperature on germination and seedling establishment of sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum L). J Herbs Spices Med Plants. 2006;11:61–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Laghmouchi Y, Belmehdi O, Bouyahya A, Skali Senhaji N, Abrini J. Effect of temperature, salt stress and pH on seed germination of medicinal plant Origanum compactum. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2017;10:156–60.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Guan B, Zhou D, Zhang H, Tian Y, Japhet W, Wang P. Germination responses of Medicago ruthenica seeds to salinity, alkalinity, and temperature. J Arid Environ. 2009;73:135–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Fallahi HR, Mohammadi M, Shajari MA. Determination of germination cardinal temperatures in two basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) cultivars non-linear regression models. J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants. 2015;2:140–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tolyat MA, Tavakkol Afshari R, Jahansoz MR, Nadjafi F, Naghdibadi HA. Determination of cardinal germination temperatures of two ecotypes of Thymus daenensis subsp. daenensis. Seed Sci Technol. 2014;42:28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Saffariha M, Azarnivand H, Tavili A. Effects of grazed exclosure on some of nutrient elements of aerial and underground organs of Artemisia sieberi, Stipa hohenacheriana and Salsola rigida. Int J Agr Agri Res. 2014;4(2):62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Saffariha M, Azarnivand H, Tavili A, Mohammadzadeh Khani H. Investigation effects of rangeland exclosure on some soil properties in Artemisia sieberi, Stipa hohenacheriana and Salsola rigida habitats (case study: roodshoor, Saveh, Iran). J Bio Env Sci. 2014;4:195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rawlins JK, Roundy BA, Davis SM, Egget D. Predicting germination in semi-arid wildland seedbeds. I Thermal germination models. Environ Exp Bot. 2012;76:60–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Cline NL, Roundy BA, Christensen WF. Using germination prediction to inform seeding potential: I Temperature range validation of germination prediction models for the Great Basin, USA. J Arid Env. 2018;150:71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bradford KJ. Applications of hydrothermal time to quantifying and modeling seed germination and dormancy. Weed Sci. 2002;50:248–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kebreab E, Murdoch AJ. Modelling the effects of water stress andtemperature on germination rate of Orobanche aegyptiaca seeds. J Exp Bot. 1999;50(334):655–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Duarte AA, de Lemos Filho JP, Marques AR. Seed germination of bromeliad species from the campo rupestre: thermal time requirements and response under predicted climate-change scenarios. Flora. 2018;238:119–28.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Watt MS, Bloomberg M, Finch-Savage WE. Development of ahydrothermal time model that accurately characterises how thermoinhibitionregulates seed germination. Plant Cell Environ. 2011;34:870–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mesgaran MB, Mashhadi HR, Alizadeh H, Hunt J, Young KR, Cousens RD. Importance of distribution function selection for hydrothermal time models of seed germination. Weed Res. 2013;53:89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hardegree SP, Walters CT, Boehm AR, Olsoy PJ, Clark PE, Pierson FB. Hydrothermal germination models: comparison of two data-fittingapproaches with probit optimization. Crop Sci. 2015;55(5):2276–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bloomberg M, Sedcole JR, Mason EG, Buchan G. Hydrothermal timegermination models for radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don). Seed Sci Res. 2009;19:171–82.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Galindez G, Seal CE, Daws MI, Lindow L, Ortega-Baes P, Pritchard HW. Alternating temperature combined with darkness resets base temperature for germination (T) in photoblastic seeds of Lippia and Aloysia (Verbenaceae). J Plant Bio. 2017;19(1):41–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jahani A. Sycamore failure hazard classification model (SFHCM): an environmental decision support system (EDSS) in urban green spaces. Int J Env Sci Tech. 2019;16:955–64.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Jahani A. Forest landscape aesthetic quality model (FLAQM): a comparative study on landscape modelling using regression analysis and artificial neural networks. J Forest Sci. 2019;65(2):61–9.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mosaffaei Z, Jahani A, Zare Chahouki MA, Goshtasb H, Etemad V, Saffariha M. Soil texture and plant degradation predictive model (STPDPM) in national parks using artificial neural network (ANN). J Model Earth Sys Environ. 2020;6:715–29.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Mosaffaei Z, Jahani A. Modeling of Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) bark thickness in urban forests using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and regression models. J Model Earth Sys Environ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00869-9(In press).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Omidi L, Zare S, Rad RM, Meshkani M, Kalantary S. Effects of shift work on health and satisfaction of workers in the mining industry. Int J Occup Hyg. 2017;9(1):21–5.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Porceddu M, Mattana E, Pritchard HW, Bacchetta G. Dissecting seed dormancy and germination in Aquilegia barbaricina, through thermal kinetics of embryo growth. J Plant Bio. 2017;19(6):983–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Khaleghpanah R, Jahani A, Khorasani N, Goshtasb H. Prediction model of citizens’ satisfaction in urban parks using artificial neural network. J Natu Environ. 2019;72(2):239–50.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Jahani A, Goshtasb H, Saffariha M. Tourism impact assessment modeling in vegetation density of protected areas using data mining techniques. J Land Deg Develop. 2020;31(12):1502–19.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Jahani R, Yazdanpanah H, Van Ruth SM, Kobarfard F, Alewijn M, Mahboubi A, Faizi M, Shojaee MH, Abadi A, Salamzadeh J. Novel application of near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics approach for detection of lime juice adulteration Ira. J Pharm Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.22037/IJPR.2019.112328.13686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jafari M, Kalantari S, Zendehdel R, Sarbakhsh P. Feasibility of substituting ethylene with sulfur hexafluoride as a tracer gas in hood performance test by ASHRAE-110-95 method. Int J Occu Hyg. 2014;6(1):31–6.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Demuth H, Beale M. Neural Network Toolbox For Use with MATLAB®. MathWorks, Inc. User’s Guide Version 4. 2002. p.840.

  45. 45.

    Pourbabaki R, Samiei S, Alefi M, Sadeghi Yarandi M, Karimi A. Modeling of occupational risk factors in the development of musculoskeletal disorders in nurses. Arch occu Heal. 2020;4(1):474–9.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Samiei S, Pourbabaki R. Risk factors of low back pain using adaptive neuro-fuzzy. Arch occu Heal. 2019;3(2):339–45.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Pourmohammad P, Jahani A, Zare Chahooki MA, Goshtasb Meigooni H. Road impact assessment modelling oniplants diversity ininational parks using regression analysis in comparison with artificial intelligence. J Model Earth Sys Environ. 2020;6(3):1281–92.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Jahani A, Saffariha M. Aesthetic preference and mental restoration prediction in urban parks: An application of environmental modeling approach. J Urban Green. 2020;54:126775.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Shams SR, Jahani A, Moinaddini M, Khorasani N. Air carbon monoxide forecasting using an artificial neural network in comparison with multiple regression. J Model Earth Sys Environ. 2020;6(3):1467–75.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kalantary S, Jahani A, Pourbabaki R, Beigzadeh Z. Application of ANN modeling techniques in the prediction of the diameter of PCL/gelatin nanofibers in environmental and medical studies. J RSC Advan. 2019;9(43):24858–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kalantary S, Jahani A, Jahani R. MLR and Ann approaches for prediction of synthetic/natural nanoibers diameter in the environmental and medical applications. J Sci Rep. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65121-x(In press).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Jahani A, Rayegani B. Forest landscape visual quality evaluation using artificial intelligence techniques as a decision support system. J Stoch Environ Res Ris Assess. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01832-x(In press).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Beigzadeh Z, Pourhassan B, Golbabaei F. Occupational exposure to wood dust and risk of nasopharyngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Env res. 2019;171:170–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Beigzadeh Z, Pourhossein M, Samiei S, Pourbabaki R, Pourhassan B, Motamedi Nejad H. Evaluation of pulmonary function of construction workers in Tehran city in 2017. J Heal Safe Wor. 2019;8(4):323–32.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Jahani A. Aesthetic quality evaluation modeling of forest landscape using artificial neural network. J Wood Forest Sci Tech. 2017;24(3):17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Jahani A, Etemad V, Doolati M, Avani N. Effects of planting depth and planting density on height growth, basal diameter and viability of Saxaul (Haloxylon persicum) Ira. J Ran Des Res. 2011;18(3):463–73.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Gorai M, Gasmi H, Neffati M. Factors influencing seed germination of medicinal plant Salvia aegyptiaca L. (Lamiaceae). Sau J Bio Sci. 2011;18:255–60.

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Hajlaoui H, Denden M, Bouslama M. Etude de la variabilité intraspécifique de tolérance au stress salin du pois chiche (Cicer arietinum L) au stade germination. Tropicultura. 2007;25:168–73.

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Bahraminejad M, Rayegani B, Jahani A, Nezami B. Proposing an early-warning system for optimal management of protected areas (Case study: darmiyan protected area, Eastern Iran). J Nat Cons. 2018;46:79–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the experts of Iranian National Department of Environment in Alborz province who supported us for data collection.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: MS; Methodology: MS; Software: AJ; Validation: DP; Formal Analysis: MS; Investigation: AJ; Resources: AJ; Data curation: MS; Writing–original draft: MS; Writing–review and editing: MS; Visualisation: AJ; Supervision: AJ; Project Administration: DP, MS; Funding acquisition: DP, MS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Jahani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No permissions were required to collect seeds from the studied area because seeds were collected under supervision of provincial Department of Environment. There is no committee/review board or regional/national committee to approve the study; however any field study in protected areas is under supervision of provincial Department of Environment. The provincial Department of Environment supervision letter has been submitted as Additional file 1.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

The provincial Department of Environment supervision letter.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saffariha, M., Jahani, A. & Potter, D. Seed germination prediction of Salvia limbata under ecological stresses in protected areas: an artificial intelligence modeling approach. BMC Ecol 20, 48 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00316-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ecological stress
  • Multi-layer perceptron
  • Multiple linear regression
  • Neural network
  • Seed germination
  • Salvia limbata