Skip to main content
Download PDF

Daily fluctuating temperatures decrease growth and reproduction rate of a lethal amphibian fungal pathogen in culture

BMC Ecology volume 20, Article number: 18 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) are contributing to species die-offs worldwide. We can better understand EIDs by using ecological approaches to study pathogen biology. For example, pathogens are exposed to variable temperatures across daily, seasonal, and annual scales. Exposure to temperature fluctuations may reduce pathogen growth and reproduction, which could affect pathogen virulence, transmission, and environmental persistence with implications for disease. We examined the effect of a variable thermal environment on reproductive life history traits of the fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd). Bd causes chytridiomycosis, an emerging infectious disease of amphibians. As a pathogen of ectothermic hosts, Bd can be exposed to large temperature fluctuations in nature. To determine the effect of fluctuating temperatures on Bd growth and reproduction, we collected temperature data from breeding pools of the Yosemite toad (Anaxyrus canorus), a federally threatened species that is susceptible to chytridiomycosis. We cultured Bd under a daily fluctuating temperature regime that simulated Yosemite toad breeding pool temperatures and measured Bd growth, reproduction, fecundity, and viability.

Results

We observed decreased Bd growth and reproduction in a diurnally fluctuating thermal environment as compared to cultures grown at constant temperatures within the optimal Bd thermal range. We also found that Bd exhibits temperature-induced trade-offs under constant low and constant high temperature conditions.

Conclusions

Our results provide novel insights on variable responses of Bd to dynamic thermal conditions and highlight the importance of incorporating realistic temperature fluctuations into investigations of pathogen ecology and EIDs.

Background

Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) are increasing in incidence and are responsible for plant and animal population declines in managed and wild systems [20, 29, 68]. To understand the drivers of EIDs, the rapidly developing field of disease ecology integrates traditional approaches of parasite biology into ecological and evolutionary frameworks [16]. One recent focus has been to understand the effects of environmental temperature fluctuations on disease [11, 69]. Differences in magnitude, range, and variability of daily temperature fluctuations have been shown to affect transmission intensity of malaria [40, 45], transmission rates of dengue virus [9, 30], biocontrol of the chagas disease vector [18], and susceptibility of black abalone to withering syndrome [4]. Temperature can profoundly influence disease outcomes due to the thermal sensitivity of host and pathogen traits, including pathogen growth and reproduction [1, 10, 58]. Because pathogen growth and reproduction are tied to virulence [38], understanding the responses of these life history traits to thermal heterogeneity may reveal important patterns in infectious disease.

Temperature can affect the disease ecology of chytridiomycosis [57, 76], a lethal emerging infectious disease of amphibians that is responsible for global amphibian declines [63, 64]. Chytridiomycosis is caused by the pathogenic fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), which has a complex and temperature-sensitive life history [5, 35]. Motile Bd zoospores encyst in keratinized amphibian tissues and develop into zoosporangia [5, 48]. Zoosporangia produce the next generation of zoospores and release them into the environment or back onto the amphibian host [6, 35]. This life cycle requires temperatures between approximately 2–27 °C in vitro, with an optimal temperature range between 15 and 25 °C and a drop in reproduction and viability above 27 °C [51, 66, 73, 78]. Because increases in Bd loads correlate with the severity of chytridiomycosis [72, 74], exposure to temperatures above the Bd thermal maximum that negatively affect Bd growth and reproduction may decrease infection intensities and slow disease progression [23, 26, 62].

To date, temperature studies have predominantly focused on Bd responses at constant temperatures (e.g. [51, 78]). However, amphibian hosts live in microhabitats with remarkable thermal heterogeneity across daily, seasonal, and annual cycles (e.g. [43, 75]). Constant temperature studies have provided critical insights into Bd biology but have not discerned how realistic fluctuating thermal environments may influence Bd growth and reproduction. Recent work by Raffel et al. [55] and Greenspan et al. [23] suggest that fluctuating thermal conditions can have profound effects on Bd growth in vitro and on chytridiomycosis development in vivo. These studies add to evidence in other disease systems that constant temperature experiments may not be generalizable to disease dynamics in wild populations because thermal fluctuations can have disproportionate biological consequences on pathogen traits [9, 30, 40, 45]. In addition, thermal heterogeneity may influence the persistence of free-living Bd in water bodies used by amphibian hosts. While the mechanisms or duration of Bd persistence in natural environments remain unclear [7, 41], models suggest that extended environmental persistence of Bd outside amphibian hosts is likely to increase local extinction risk [39]. Understanding how dynamic thermal regimes affect Bd outside of hosts may be an important conservation tool to target where Bd is (and is not) on a landscape [21].

In this study, we examined responses of Bd in culture to biologically realistic temperature fluctuations that simulate the thermal conditions of water bodies used by the Yosemite toad (Anaxyrus [Bufo] canorus). The Yosemite toad is a federally threatened California endemic that is highly susceptible to lethal chytridiomycosis in controlled exposure experiments [32]. While Bd infection has been detected in all life stages of wild Yosemite toads [19]; C. Dodge unpublished data), the role of Bd in the decline of this species is not well understood. Yosemite toads breed and develop in shallow pools in high elevation meadows in the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California, USA that undergo large daily temperature fluctuations compared to the Bd thermal range (Fig. 1a; [13, 28, 43]). However, it is unclear how these temperature fluctuations affect Bd growth and reproduction and in turn, the disease ecology of this system.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Observed and experimental diurnal temperature fluctuations. a Water temperature over a 24-h period of 10 different breeding pools containing Yosemite toad tadpoles (grey lines; yellow line represents pool fluctuating within 27.5 and 7.5 °C). b Incubator temperature profiles over a 24-h period. Fluctuating temperature = black; constant temperature at daily thermal maximum (27.5 °C) = red; constant temperature at daily thermal minimum (7.5 °C) = blue; constant temperature at daily thermal mean (17.5 °C) = green. Bd thermal optimum (green shaded band) and Bd thermal tolerance (grey shaded band) shown for reference

Full size image

To better understand Bd responses to fluctuating thermal regimes, we collected temperature data from Yosemite toad breeding pools and cultured Bd under fluctuating thermal conditions that simulated pool temperatures (Fig. 1). To assess Bd responses to thermal fluctuation, we compared multiple reproductive life history traits of a single Bd isolate grown at fluctuating or constant temperatures. Our constant temperature treatments span the Bd thermal range and represent the daily minimum, daily mean, and daily maximum of the fluctuating temperature profile (Fig. 1b). We quantified Bd growth over time using measurements of culture optical density, motile zoospore counts, culture fecundity (ratio of motile zoospores to optical density), and zoosporangia viability assays. We hypothesized that fluctuating temperatures would reduce Bd growth as compared to Bd grown at the constant daily mean temperature of 17.5 °C. We predicted that exposure to daily temperature fluctuations would reduce Bd growth rate, fecundity, zoosporangia viability, zoospore production, and time to peak zoospore release as compared to Bd grown at 17.5 °C.

Results

Optical density growth measurements

We quantified total culture growth over time by measuring culture optical density (OD490; [51, 59, 60]), and we compared the effects of temperature treatments on Bd growth by fitting three-parameter logistic growth curves to OD490 measurements using a nonlinear mixed effects modeling approach [49]. Total culture growth differed among temperature treatments (Fig. 2a). Temperature altered Bd culture carrying capacity during stationary phase (asymptote; F = 201.8, P < 0.001), time to maximum growth rate (inflection point; F = 28.7, P < 0.001), and growth curve scale (scale; F = 17.1, P < 0.001) in 17.5 °C, 27.5 °C, and fluctuating temperature cultures (Fig. 2a). The three-parameter logistic growth model suggests that 17.5 °C cultures had the highest maximum growth, reached stationary phase after 14 days, and achieved the fastest growth rate during the exponential growth phase of all temperature treatments (Table 1). Compared to cultures grown at 17.5 °C, Bd grown at fluctuating temperatures had lower maximum growth and a lower maximum growth rate (Table 1). Cultures grown at 27.5 °C had lower growth rate and lower carrying capacity than optimal and fluctuating temperature cultures but reached maximum growth faster. Linear models of OD490 readings for 7.5 °C cultures suggested little growth over time (F = 3.15, df = 13, P = 0.10).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Daily fluctuating temperature reduces Bd growth, zoospore production, and zoosporangia viability but not culture fecundity compared to Bd grown at an optimal temperature. a Daily optical density measurements of Bd cultures suggest differences in maximum growth and logistic growth rate among cultures incubated at 17.5 °C (green), 27.5 °C (red), and fluctuating temperatures (black). OD readings of cultures grown at 7.5 °C (blue) did not follow a pattern of logistic growth. Points represent means (n = 16 treatment−1 day−1). b Zoospore production differed among Bd cultures grown at constant (7.5 °C, 17.5 °C, or 27.5 °C) and fluctuating temperatures. Cultures grown at 17.5 °C had the highest maximum zoospore production (ANOVA, P < 0.001). Cultures grown at 7.5 °C had similar maximum zoospore production as cultures grown under fluctuating temperatures (Tukey HSD, P = 0.99) but reached peak production later. Cultures grown at 27.5 °C did not produce zoospores. Points represent mean counts of motile zoospores (n = 6 treatment−1 day−1). c Fluctuating and optimal temperature cultures did not differ in fecundity. Culture fecundity was measured as the ratio of motile zoospores to total culture growth (OD) day−1. Despite reduced total growth (OD), cultures grown at 7.5 °C had higher fecundity than cultures grown at 17.5 °C or fluctuating temperatures (ANOVA, P < 0.001). Cultures grown at 27.5 °C did not produce zoospores. Dashed vertical lines correspond to time of peak zoospore production in fluctuating (day 8), 17.5 °C (day 10), and 7.5 °C (day 14) cultures. Points represent means (n = 6 treatment−1 day−1). d Zoosporangia viability differed among Bd cultures grown at fluctuating and constant temperatures. Cultures grown under fluctuating temperatures had lower zoosporangia viability than cultures grown at 17.5 °C but higher viability than cultures grown at 7.5 °C or at 27.5 °C (Kruskal–Wallis, P < 0.001). Points represent means (n = 8 treatment−1 day−1). In all panels, error bars represent standard error and letters indicate significant differences

Full size image
Table 1 Parameter estimates for logistic growth models of Bd grown at constant (17.5 °C and 27.5 °C) and fluctuating temperatures (7.5–27.5 °C, “Flux”)
Full size table

Zoospore production

We counted motile zoospores from randomly selected wells over time to quantify zoospore production [70]. Bd cultures grown at 7.5 °C, 17.5 °C, 27.5 °C, or a daily fluctuating temperature profile differed in time to and productivity at peak zoospore release (Fig. 2b; ANOVA, df = 3, F = 42.2, P < 0.001). Between-group comparisons suggest that peak zoospore production in cultures grown at 17.5 °C was higher than in cultures grown at any other temperature profile (Tukey HSD, P < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons with 17.5 °C). Peak zoospore release occurred over the same period from days 6 to 10 in fluctuating temperature and 17.5 °C cultures, but the mean maximum zoospore production was lower in fluctuating cultures (7 ± 1 × 104 zoospores mL−1) than in 17.5 °C cultures (21 ± 3 × 104 zoospores mL−1; Tukey HSD, P < 0.001). Cultures grown at 7.5 °C took the longest to reach peak zoospore production, with a mean maximum of 7 ± 1 × 104 zoospores mL−1 on day 14. Although there was a 4–6-day difference in timing to zoospore peak, there was no difference in maximum zoospore production between Bd cultures grown at 7.5 °C and at fluctuating temperatures (Tukey HSD, P = 0.99). We did not observe new zoospore production in cultures grown at 27.5 °C.

Culture fecundity

We measured culture fecundity as the ratio of motile zoospores to total culture growth per day. We found that fecundity differed among temperature treatments (ANOVA, F = 164.2, df = 2, P < 0.001), with cultures grown at 7.5 °C having higher fecundity than cultures grown at 17.5 °C or fluctuating temperatures (Fig. 2c). At peak zoospore production, cultures grown at 7.5 °C were on average 26% (15–43%) more productive per unit culture growth (OD490) than cultures grown at 17.5 °C (Tukey’s HSD, P < 0.001), and on average 23% (14–39%) more productive than cultures grown at fluctuating temperatures (Tukey’s HSD, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in fecundity at peak zoospore production between cultures grown at 17.5 °C and fluctuating temperatures (Tukey’s HSD, P = 0.87). Cultures grown at 27.5 °C did not produce zoospores and therefore had a fecundity of zero.

Zoosporangia viability

We used an MTT assay, a colorimetric test of cell metabolic activity, to quantify differences in culture viability over time among temperature treatments [33]. The MTT assay differentiates between living and dead cells and captures the decay phase of culture growth, providing additional growth metrics that optical density measurements cannot detect [33]. Temperature altered culture metabolic activity, with differences in maximum metabolic activity among all temperature treatments (Fig. 2d; Kruskal–Wallis, χ2 = 28.75, df = 3, P < 0.001; Conover–Iman, P < 0.001 for all pairwise temperature comparisons). Metabolic activity was highest in cultures grown at 17.5 °C (Conover–Iman, P < 0.001), with metabolic activity increasing rapidly on day 10 and peaking on day 14 (OD570 = 0.612 ± 0.045). Cultures grown at fluctuating temperatures also showed a rapid increase in metabolic activity, with a peak on day 10 (OD570 = 0.323 ± 0.009) that lasted through day 14, but fluctuating temperature cultures never surpassed optimal temperature cultures in metabolic activity (Conover–Iman, P < 0.001). Peak metabolic activity was lower in cultures grown at low temperatures (OD570 = 0.087 ± 0.012) than in cultures grown at 17.5 °C or at fluctuating temperatures and reached maximum metabolic activity on day 16 long after 17.5 °C and fluctuating temperature cultures. Although zoosporangia grown at 27.5 °C failed to produce zoospores, zoosporangia remained metabolically active at 27.5 °C for 14 d and reached peak metabolic activity (OD570 = 0.045 ± 0.001) on day 10.

Discussion

Temperature fluctuations can alter the thermal performance of a pathogen and thereby the host–pathogen interactions in an infectious disease system [9, 30, 45, 55]. We examined the effect of an ecologically relevant daily temperature fluctuation on Bd reproductive life history traits. We found that temperatures that simulated those of breeding pools occupied by a susceptible host species reduced Bd growth and reproduction. Cultures grown in daily fluctuating thermal conditions had decreased total growth, growth rate, viability, and zoospore production compared to Bd grown at the constant daily mean temperature of 17.5 °C. Since increases in Bd load frequently determine the development of chytridiomycosis and resulting mortality [72, 74], reductions in Bd growth and zoospore production under daily fluctuating temperatures may slow disease progression in wild amphibian hosts [23].

Decreased Bd growth and zoospore production under fluctuating temperatures could be attributed to several factors. The time interval that Bd is exposed to temperatures above its thermal optimum in a diurnal cycle, and/or the magnitude of increase of the daily temperature maximum above the Bd thermal optimum may be important constraints on Bd life history traits in fluctuating thermal environments [23]. Temperature performance curves are asymmetric, with a gradual rise in performance from the thermal minimum to the optimal temperature and an abrupt drop in performance as temperatures rise above the thermal optimum [27, 37]. As such, exposure to temperatures above an organism’s thermal optimum may disproportionately affect its performance and fitness [3, 37]. These observations may be relevant for disease dynamics in Yosemite toad pool habitats where water temperatures frequently warm above 27.5 °C in summer months, with some daily temperature maxima recordings reaching 37 °C (Fig. 1a; [36]). Further, the daily temperature maximum, minimum, and range of Yosemite toad breeding pools vary across elevational, latitudinal, and seasonal gradients [36], which may contribute to temporal and spatial patterns of Bd persistence in the environment or abundance on hosts. As such, understanding subtleties in the duration or intensity of exposure to temperatures above a pathogen’s thermal optimum may be important in predicting disease in wild systems [15, 23, 46].

Alternatively, the decreased Bd growth and zoospore production we observed under fluctuating temperatures may be the result of exposure to a novel thermal environment [55, 71]. Exposure to variable and unpredictable temperatures can reduce performance of organisms, including pathogens [37, 46, 69]. As such, exposure to a novel thermal environment (i.e. exposure to fluctuating temperatures after culturing at constant optimal temperatures) could result in the decreases in growth and reproduction we observed. However, continued exposure to a predictable daily fluctuating temperature profile across multiple generations may result in a return to Bd growth and reproduction rates observed at optimal temperatures if the pathogen adapts to its new thermal environment [22]. Indeed, Bd may be able to respond to selective pressures from different thermal environments over time in vitro [71] and may grow faster under predictable rather than stochastic temperature fluctuations [55]. Adaptation to fluctuating thermal environments remains to be tested using experimental evolution approaches (e.g., serially passaging Bd under a variety of temperature profiles to track adaptive shifts) and could improve understanding of Bd persistence in wild systems, such as for Yosemite toads where the pattern of diurnal temperature fluctuation is largely predictable in summer months [36].

Our study provided several additional insights on pathogen trade-offs resulting from exposure to constant low and constant high temperatures. At constant low temperatures (7.5 °C), Bd cultures had reduced overall growth and a longer reproductive cycle but the highest fecundity of all temperature treatments. These results corroborate findings from Bd growth experiments at 7–10 °C [66, 71, 78] and provide strong evidence of fitness trade-offs that are induced by temperature. At constant high temperatures (27.5 °C), Bd cultures did not produce a subsequent generation of zoospores but remained metabolically active for 14 days. This result suggests that Bd may exhibit an additional temperature-induced trade-off in reproductive investment, reducing zoospore production to increase survival probability at or above its thermal maximum [56, 65]. This strategy has been observed in other fungi that show greater temperature constraints on spore production than on growth [25]. Further investigations into trade-offs for reproductive investment may have meaningful implications for disease development and transmission, where exposure to temperatures above the Bd thermal maximum may reduce zoospore production (and therefore pathogenicity) but may not fully eliminate Bd from hosts or the environment [14, 66, 73].

Quantifying the effect of fluctuating temperatures on Bd life history traits, decoupled from host defenses, provides important information for predicting pathogen growth, reproduction, and trade-offs in thermal conditions experienced by wild amphibian hosts [23, 71, 73, 78]. Important next steps include investigating how daily fluctuating temperatures affect host–pathogen interactions in vivo because Bd growth patterns in culture under dynamic thermal environments do not always match growth patterns on hosts [10, 55]. Bd must contend with host behavioral thermoregulation, host microbiome, and host immune responses in vivo [44, 57, 77]. These host defenses, pathogen growth, and their interaction can be affected by thermal conditions [10, 24, 52, 54, 61]. Further investigations into the role of realistic temperature fluctuations in relation to the thermal performance of both host and pathogen will dramatically advance our understanding of disease outcomes under natural conditions [11, 55].

Conclusions

Our results underscore the importance of investigating pathogen life history traits under ecologically relevant conditions. Differences in magnitude, range, and variability of temperature fluctuations affect host and pathogen traits in multiple disease systems [1, 58]. Experiments that incorporate simulated natural temperature fluctuations, as opposed to temperature means, are likely to reveal important patterns in host and pathogen biology that may help identify potential climatic refugia or hotspots for infectious disease outbreaks [12, 15, 40, 67]. Because temperature maxima and variability are projected to increase at daily and seasonal scales [17, 47], it will be important to identify pathogen responses to larger and less predictable changes in temperature to better understand emerging infectious diseases in a changing climate.

Methods

Temperature profile selection

We collected temperature data from Yosemite toad breeding pools in ten different sites that are representative of the diversity of toad habitat across Yosemite National Park, CA. We placed one iButton (Thermochron) in each ephemeral pool at a depth that Yosemite toad tadpoles were observed to be most abundant (\(\bar{x}\) = 5 cm). This stratum of observed high abundance and activity was generally at the peripheral margin of each pool with highest sun exposure and matched the narrow preference for pool microhabitat depths found in other Yosemite toad tadpole studies (4–5 cm; [31]). We recorded pool temperatures at egg deposition, which varied across sites from 07-Jun-2016 to 26-Jun-2016. Temperatures were recorded every 2 h until collection ceased between 18-Jul-2016 and 07-Aug-2016. We selected a mean fluctuating temperature profile from a single pool that diurnally oscillated between 7.5 °C and 27.5 °C, simulating thermal conditions experienced by Yosemite toads in the field (Fig. 1a). In addition, we grew Bd at constant temperatures of 27.5 °C, 7.5 °C, and 17.5 °C, which represent the daily high, low, and mean temperatures of the fluctuating profile respectively (Fig. 1b).

Isolate selection, culturing, and plate set-up

We selected Sierra Nevada isolate MYLF-16343, collected from mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) skin and known to cause lethal chytridiomycosis in Yosemite toads [32]. Immediately following isolation, we cryo-archived MYLF-16343 [8]. Prior to our experiment, we revived the isolate and passaged it using standard protocols [8]. When we observed peak zoospore release, we filtered cultures to remove zoosporangia, counted zoospores using a hemocytometer, and diluted the zoospore filtrate to a concentration of 46 × 104 zoospores mL−1 [70]. We inoculated zoospores into 12 sterile, flat-bottom 96-well plates. In experimental wells, we pipetted 50 μL of zoospore filtrate and 50 μL TGhL for a final concentration of 23 × 104 zoospores mL−1 well−1. In negative control wells, we pipetted 50 μL of heat-killed standardized zoospore filtrate (10-min incubation at 40 °C) and 50 μL TGhL. We randomly assigned three plates to either 7.5 °C, 17.5 °C, 27.5 °C, or fluctuating temperature (diurnal fluctuation between 7.5 and 27.5 °C, Fig. 1b) incubators (Conviron).

Quantification of Bd growth

We used four methods to quantify Bd growth over time: (1) optical density (OD), (2) motile zoospore counts, (3) culture fecundity, and (4) zoosporangia viability assays. We measured OD of individual wells daily at 490 nm (Biotek ELx800 Absorbance Reader) to capture Bd logistic growth over time [51, 59, 60]. We counted motile zoospores from randomly selected wells (n = 6 treatment−1 day−1) using a hemocytometer to quantify zoospore production [70]. Due to the differences in life cycle times for Bd cultures incubating at different temperatures, we counted zoospores from plates incubated at 17.5 °C, 27.5 °C, and fluctuating temperatures every other day and from plates at 7.5 °C once every four days. We used the ratio of zoospores to culture OD per well as a metric for culture fecundity (n = 6 treatment−1 day−1). We used an MTT assay to measure zoosporangia metabolic activity and viability (n = 8 treatment−1 day−1; [33]). The MTT assay is a colorimetric test of cell viability in which the yellow tetrazolium salt MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) is reduced to purple MTT-formazan crystals in metabolically active cells [34, 42]. This color change can be quantified by solubilizing the crystals and measuring culture absorbance at a sensitive wavelength (570 nm, [2]). We destructively sampled wells used for zoospore counts and zoosporangia viability assays.

Statistical analysis

We conducted all analyses using R v3.4.3 [53]. Unless otherwise noted, summary statistics in figures and text represent mean ± standard error (SE). We fit three-parameter logistic curves to OD measurements of culture growth using nonlinear mixed effects models with the ‘nlme’ package v3.1.131.1 in R [50]. Three-parameter logistic models can be used to predict the culture stationary phase (i.e., asymptote), the time at which cultures are in exponential growth phase halfway to stationary phase (i.e., inflection point), and a scale parameter that determines the steepness of the growth curve. We included temperature treatment fixed effects and well random effects on all parameters. We addressed within-group error heteroscedasticity by adding an identity variance structure to the model [49]. We corrected for initial zoospore inoculation and media color by subtracting OD values of heat-killed controls from OD values of wells containing Bd and ran models using wells that were not used for zoospore counts or MTT assays (n = 16). We used analysis of variance (ANOVA) and likelihood ratio tests for model selection and tested for the joint significance of the temperature fixed effect with an F-test. For OD measurements of cultures grown at a constant temperature of 7.5 °C, Bd growth was slow and minimal such that nonlinear mixed effects models did not converge. We fit a linear model to OD measurements from these low temperature cultures.

To compare differences in peak zoospore production among temperature treatments, we used ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests. We used a square root transformation for the zoospore counts to achieve homogeneity of variance among temperature treatments. To compare differences in zoosporangia viability at peak culture metabolic activity, we used a Kruskal–Wallis test. We looked at pairwise comparisons between temperature treatments using a Conover–Iman post hoc test with a Bonferroni correction. To evaluate fecundity, we used a ratio of zoospores produced to mean culture OD day−1. We log-transformed this fecundity metric and added a correction factor of 1 to allow for log-transformation of values from wells with zero fecundity (no zoospores produced). We compared differences in culture fecundity at peak zoospore production using ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests and back-transformed percent differences in the reported fecundity results.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Altizer S, Ostfeld RS, Johnson PT, Kutz S, Harvell CD. Climate change and infectious diseases: from evidence to a predictive framework. Science. 2013;341:514–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Altman FP. Tetrazolium salts and formazans. Prog Histochem Cyto. 1976;9:3–51.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amarasekare P, Savage V. A framework for elucidating the temperature dependence of fitness. Am Nat. 2012;179:178–91.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Horin T, Lenihan HS, Lafferty KD. Variable intertidal temperature explains why disease endangers black abalone. Ecology. 2012;94:161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger L, Speare R, Daszak P, Green DE, Cunningham AA, Goggin CL, Slocombe R, Ragan MA, Hyatt AD, McDonald KR, Hines HB. Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines in the rain forests of Australia and Central America. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1998;95:9031–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Berger L, Hyatt AD, Speare R, Longcore JE. Life cycle stages of the amphibian chytrid Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Dis Aquat Org. 2005;68:51–63.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Berger L, Roberts AA, Voyles J, Longcore JE, Murray KA, Skerratt LF. History and recent progress on chytridiomycosis in amphibians. Fungal Ecol. 2016;19:89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyle DG, Hyatt AD, Daszak P, Berger L, Longcore JE, Porter D, Hengstberger SG, Olsen V. Cryo-archiving of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and other chytridiomycetes. Dis Aquat Org. 2003;56:59–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrington LB, Seifert SN, Armijos MV, Lambrechts L, Scott TW. Reduction of Aedes aegypti vector competence for dengue virus under large temperature fluctuations. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88:689–97.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen JM, Venesky MD, Sauer EL, Civitello DJ, McMahon TA, Roznik EA, Rohr JR. The thermal mismatch hypothesis explains host susceptibility to an emerging infectious disease. Ecol Lett. 2017;20:184–93.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen JM, Civitello DJ, Venesky MD, McMahon TA, Rohr JR. An interaction between climate change and infectious disease drove widespread amphibian declines. Global Change Biol. 2019;25:927–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen JM, McMahon TA, Ramsay C, Roznik EA, Sauer EL, Bessler S, Civitello DJ, Delius BK, Halstead N, Knutie SA, Nguyen KH. Impacts of thermal mismatches on chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis prevalence are moderated by life stage, body size, elevation and latitude. Ecol Lett. 2019;22:817–25.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cunningham JD. Additional observations on the ecology of the Yosemite toad. Bufo canorus Herpetologica. 1963;19:56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daskin JH, Alford RA, Puschendorf R. Short-term exposure to warm microhabitats could explain amphibian persistence with Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e26215.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Daversa DR, Monsalve-Carcaño C, Carrascal LM, Bosch J. Seasonal migrations, body temperature fluctuations, and infection dynamics in adult amphibians. PeerJ. 2018;6:e4698.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Demas GE, Nelson RJ. Ecoimmunology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parmesan C, Changnon SA, Karl TR, Mearns LO. Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science. 2000;289:2068–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fargues J, Luz C. Effects of fluctuating moisture and temperature regimes on the infection potential of Beauveria bassiana for Rhodnius prolixus. J Invertebr Pathol. 2000;75:202–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fellers GM, Cole RA, Reinitz DM, Kleeman PM. Amphibian chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) in coastal and montane California, USA anurans. Herp Cons Biol. 2011;6:383–94.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fisher MC, Henk DA, Briggs CJ, Brownstein JS, Madoff LC, McCraw SL, Gurr SJ. Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature. 2012;484:186–204.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Garner TW, Schmidt BR, Martel A, Pasmans F, Muths E, Cunningham AA, Weldon C, Fisher MC, Bosch J. Mitigating amphibian chytridiomycosis in nature. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2016;371:20160207.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghalambor CK, McKay JK, Carroll SP, Reznick DN. Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct Ecol. 2007;21:394–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Greenspan SE, Bower DS, Webb RJ, Roznik EA, Stevenson LA, Berger L, Alford RA. Realistic heat pulses protect frogs from disease under simulated rainforest frog thermal regimes. Funct Ecol. 2017;31:2274–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Greenspan SE, Bower DS, Webb RJ, Berger L, Rudd D, Schwarzkopf L, Alford RA. White blood cell profiles in amphibians help to explain disease susceptibility following temperature shifts. Dev Comp Immunol. 2017;77:280–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Griffin DH. Fungal physiology. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hettyey A, Ujszegi J, Herczeg D, Holly D, Vörös J, Schmidt BR, Bosch J. Mitigating disease impacts in amphibian populations: capitalizing on the thermal optimum mismatch between a pathogen and its host. Front Ecol Evol. 2019;7:254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huey RB, Stevenson RD. Integrating thermal physiology and ecology of ectotherms: a discussion of approaches. Am Zool. 1979;19:357–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Karlstrom EL. The toad genus Bufo in the Sierra Nevada of California: ecological and systematic relationships. Berkeley: PhD dissertation, University of California; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lafferty KD. The ecology of climate change and infectious diseases. Ecology. 2009;90:888–900.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lambrechts L, Paaijmans KP, Fansiri T, Carrington LB, Kramer LD, Thomas MB, Scott TW. Impact of daily temperature fluctuations on dengue virus transmission by Aedes aegypti. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:7460–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Liang CT, Grasso RL, Nelson-Paul JJ, Vincent KE, Lind AJ. Fine-scale habitat characteristics related to occupancy of the Yosemite toad. Anaxyrus canorus. Copeia. 2017;105:120–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lindauer AL, Voyles J. Out of the frying pan, into the fire? Yosemite toad (Anaxyrus canorus) susceptibility to Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis after development under drying conditions. Herp Cons Biol. 2019;14:185–98.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lindauer A, May T, Rios-Sotelo G, Sheets C, Voyles J. Quantifying Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans viability. EcoHealth. 2019;23:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liu Y, Peterson DA, Kimura H, Schubert D. Mechanism of cellular 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction. J Neurochem. 1997;69:581–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Longcore JE, Pessier AP, Nichols DK. Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis gen et sp. nov., a chytrid pathogenic to amphibians. Mycologia. 1999;91:219–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Maier PA. Evolutionary past, present, and future of the Yosemite toad (Anaxyrus canorus): A total evidence approach to delineating conservation units. San Diego: Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of California Riverside and San Diego State University; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Martin TL, Huey RB. Why “suboptimal” is optimal: Jensen’s inequality and ectotherm thermal preferences. Am Nat. 2008;171:E102–18.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. May RM, Anderson RM. Population biology of infectious diseases: part II. Nature. 1979;280:455.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Mitchell KM, Churcher TS, Garner TW, Fisher MC. Persistence of the emerging pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis outside the amphibian host greatly increases the probability of host extinction. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;275:329–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mordecai EA, Caldwell JM, Grossman MK, Lippi CA, Johnson LR, Neira M, Rohr JR, Ryan SJ, Savage V, Shocket MS, Sippy R. Thermal biology of mosquito-borne disease. Ecol Lett. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13335.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Mosher BA, Huyvaert KP, Bailey LL. Beyond the swab: ecosystem sampling to understand the persistence of an amphibian pathogen. Oecologia. 2018;188:319–30.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1982;65:55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mullally DP, Cunningham JD. Aspects of the thermal ecology of the Yosemite toad. Herpetologica. 1956;12:57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Myers JM, Ramsey JP, Blackman AL, Nichols AE, Minbiole KP, Harris RN. Synergistic inhibition of the lethal fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis: the combined effect of symbiotic bacterial metabolites and antimicrobial peptides of the frog Rana muscosa. J Chem Ecol. 2012;38:958–65.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Paaijmans KP, Blanford S, Bell AS, Blanford JI, Read AF, Thomas MB. Influence of climate on malaria transmission depends on daily temperature variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:15135–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Paaijmans KP, Heinig RL, Seliga RA, Blanford JI, Blanford S, Murdock CC, Thomas MB. Temperature variation makes ectotherms more sensitive to climate change. Global Chang Biol. 2013;19:2373–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pachauri RK, Allen MR, Barros VR, Broome J, Cramer W, Christ R, Church JA, Clarke L, Dahe Q, Dasgupta P, et al. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pessier AP, Nichols DK, Longcore JE, Fuller MS. Cutaneous chytridiomycosis in poison dart frogs (Dendrobates spp.) and White’s tree frogs (Litoria caerulea). J Vet Diagn Investig. 1999;11:194–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. NY: Springer; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team. (2018) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-137. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.

  51. Piotrowski JS, Annis SL, Longcore JE. Physiology of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, a chytrid pathogen of amphibians. Mycologia. 2004;96:9–15.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Plytycz B, Jozkowicz A. Differential effects of temperature on macrophages of ectothermic vertebrates. J Leukocyte Biol. 1994;56:729–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. R Core Team (2018). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

  54. Raffel TR, Rohr JR, Kiesecker JM, Hudson PJ. Negative effects of changing temperature on amphibian immunity under field conditions. Funct Ecol. 2006;20:819–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Raffel TR, Romansic JM, Halstead NT, McMahon TA, Venesky MD, Rohr JR. Disease and thermal acclimation in a more variable and unpredictable climate. Nat Clim Change. 2013;3:146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Reece SE, Ramiro RS, Nussey DH. Plastic parasites: sophisticated strategies for survival and reproduction? Evol Appl. 2009;2:11–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Richards-Zawacki CL. Thermoregulatory behaviour affects prevalence of chytrid fungal infection in a wild population of Panamanian golden frogs. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;277:519–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Rohr JR, Dobson AP, Johnson PT, Kilpatrick AM, Paull SH, Raffel TR, Thomas MB. Frontiers in climate change–disease research. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011;26:270–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Rollins-Smith LA, Carey C, Longcore J, Doersam JK, Boutte A, Bruzgal JE, Conlon JM. Activity of antimicrobial skin peptides from ranid frogs against Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, the chytrid fungus associated with global amphibian declines. Dev Comp Immunol. 2002;26:471–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Rollins-Smith LA, Woodhams DC, Reinert LK, Vredenburg VT, Briggs CJ, Nielsen PF, Conlon JM. Antimicrobial peptide defenses of the mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa). Dev Comp Immunol. 2006;30:831–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Rollins-Smith LA, Woodhams DC. Amphibian immunity: Staying in tune with the environment. In: Demas GE, Nelson RJ, editors. Ecoimmunology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 92–143.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rowley JJ, Alford RA. Hot bodies protect amphibians against chytrid infection in nature. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1515.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Scheele BC, Pasmans F, Skerratt LF, Berger L, Martel A, Beukema W, Acevedo AA, Burrowes PA, Carvalho T, Catenazzi A, De la Riva I. Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. Science. 2019;363:1459–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Skerratt LF, Berger L, Speare R, Cashins S, McDonald KR, Phillott AD, Hines HB, Kenyon N. Spread of chytridiomycosis has caused the rapid global decline and extinction of frogs. EcoHealth. 2007;4:125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Stearns SC. Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct Ecol. 1989;3:259–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Stevenson LA, Alford RA, Bell SC, Roznik EA, Berger L, Pike DA. Variation in thermal performance of a widespread pathogen, the amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73830.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Thompson RM, Beardall J, Beringer J, Grace M, Sardina P. Means and extremes: building variability into community-level climate change experiments. Ecol Lett. 2013;16:799–806.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Tompkins DM, Carver S, Jones ME, Krkošek M, Skerratt LF. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife: a critical perspective. Trends Parasitol. 2015;31:149–59.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Vasseur DA, DeLong JP, Gilbert B, Greig HS, Harley CDG, McCann KS, Savage V, Tunney TD, O’Connor MI. Increased temperature variation poses a greater risk to species than climate warming. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014;281:20132612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Voyles J. Phenotypic profiling of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, a lethal fungal pathogen of amphibians. Fungal Ecol. 2011;4:196–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Voyles J, Johnson LR, Briggs CJ, Cashins SD, Alford RA, Berger L, Skerratt LF, Speare R, Rosenblum EB. Temperature alters reproductive life history patterns in Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, a lethal pathogen associated with the global loss of amphibians. Ecol Evol. 2012;2:2241–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Voyles J, Vredenburg VT, Tunstall TS, Parker JM, Briggs CJ, Rosenblum EB. Pathophysiology in mountain yellow-legged frogs (Rana muscosa) during a chytridiomycosis outbreak. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e35374.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Voyles J, Johnson LR, Rohr J, Kelly R, Barron C, Miller D, Minster J, Rosenblum EB. Diversity in growth patterns among strains of the lethal fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis across extended thermal optima. Oecologia. 2017;184:363–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Vredenburg VT, Knapp RA, Tunstall TS, Briggs CJ. Dynamics of an emerging disease drive large-scale amphibian population extinctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:9689–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Watters JL, McMillin SL, Marhanka EC, Davis DR, Farkas JK, Kerby JL, Siler CD. Seasonality in Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis detection in amphibians in central Oklahoma, USA. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2019;50:492–7.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Woodhams DC, Alford RA, Marantelli G. Emerging disease of amphibians cured by elevated body temperature. Dis of Aquat Org. 2003;55:65–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Woodhams DC, Vredenburg VT, Simon MA, Billheimer D, Shakhtour B, Shyr Y, Briggs CJ, Rollins-Smith LA, Harris RN. Symbiotic bacteria contribute to innate immune defenses of the threatened mountain yellow-legged frog, Rana muscosa. Biol Conserv. 2007;138:390–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Woodhams DC, Alford RA, Briggs CJ, Johnson M, Rollins-Smith LA. Life-history trade-offs influence disease in changing climates: strategies of an amphibian pathogen. Ecology. 2008;89:1627–39.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Katie Haran for assistance with pathogen culturing; Megan Sidran, Julia Meyer, and Willa Gruver for assistance in field data collection; and UC Merced Sierra Nevada Institute for providing fieldwork housing and accommodations.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Science Foundation (IOS-1603808, DEB-1551488 and 1846403 to JLV) and by the U.S. Department of Defense (SERDP: RC-2638 to JLV). PAM received funding from the Harold & June Memorial, Jordan D. Covin, and ARCS scholarships.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Nevada Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV, 89557, USA

    Alexa L. Lindauer & Jamie Voyles

  2. Department of Biology, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA

    Paul A. Maier

  3. FamilyTreeDNA, Gene by Gene, 1445 N Loop W, Houston, TX, 77008, USA

    Paul A. Maier

Authors
  1. Alexa L. Lindauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul A. Maier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jamie Voyles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ALL and JV conceived and designed the experiment. PAM conceived, designed, and collected data for the field study. ALL performed the laboratory experiment and analyzed the data. ALL and JV wrote the manuscript and PAM provided editorial advice. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexa L. Lindauer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Temperature data collection in pools occupied by Yosemite toads was permitted under USFWS 10a1a permit TE40112B-0.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lindauer, A.L., Maier, P.A. & Voyles, J. Daily fluctuating temperatures decrease growth and reproduction rate of a lethal amphibian fungal pathogen in culture. BMC Ecol 20, 18 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00286-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00286-7

Keywords

  • Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis
  • Disease ecology
  • Temperature
  • Yosemite toad
  • Sierra Nevada

BMC Ecology

ISSN: 1472-6785

Contact us