Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The effect of environmental change on vascular plant and cryptogam communities from the Falkland Islands and the Maritime Antarctic



Antarctic terrestrial vegetation is subject to one of the most extreme climates on Earth. Currently, parts of Antarctica are one of the fastest warming regions on the planet. During 3 growing seasons, we investigated the effect of experimental warming on the diversity and abundance of coastal plant communities in the Maritime Antarctic region (cryptogams only) and the Falkland Islands (vascular plants only). We compared communities from the Falkland Islands (51°S, mean annual temperature 7.9°C), with those of Signy Island (60°S, -2.1°C) and Anchorage Island (67°S, -2.6°C), and experimental temperature manipulations at each of the three islands using Open Top Chambers (OTCs).


Despite the strong difference in plant growth form dominance between the Falkland Islands and the Maritime Antarctic, communities across the gradient did not differ in total diversity and species number.

During the summer months, the experimental temperature increase at 5 cm height in the vegetation was similar between the locations (0.7°C across the study). In general, the response to this experimental warming was low. Total lichen cover showed a non-significant decreasing trend at Signy Island (p < 0.06). In the grass community at the Falkland Islands total vegetation cover decreased more in the OTCs than in adjacent control plots, and two species disappeared within the OTCs after only two years. This was most likely a combined consequence of a previous dry summer and the increase in temperature caused by the OTCs.


These results suggest that small temperature increases may rapidly lead to decreased soil moisture, resulting in more stressful conditions for plants. The more open plant communities (grass and lichen) appeared more negatively affected by such changes than dense communities (dwarf shrub and moss).


Antarctica is the coldest, driest, windiest and highest continent on Earth. As a result, plant growth is largely limited to the coastal areas of the sub- and maritime-Antarctic regions. In these regions, there are small areas where vascular plants and cryptogams (mosses and lichens) can grow due to the summer melt of snow and ice. Due to the harsh climate, Antarctic vegetation mainly consists of cryptogams and there are only two vascular plant species (Deschampsia antarctica and Colobanthus quitensis). The extreme environmental conditions provide one of the main reasons why ecosystems in the Antarctic regions are relatively simple, have a poorly developed trophic structure and are species poor as compared to lower latitude ecosystems [1, 2].

Recent climate changes documented over the last 50 years along the Antarctic Peninsula have been far greater than seen at lower latitudes. The most conspicuous changes have been an average increase in temperature of about 2°C over this period [3], and changes in patterns of cyclonic activity around the Antarctic continent, along with changes in precipitation intensity [4]. The warming trends along the Antarctic Peninsula are not constant throughout the year, with higher increases during winter than during the summer [3].

These changes raise the question of whether this (small) apparent reduction in ecological stress through warming will be sufficient to influence the distribution and abundance of cryptogams and vascular plants in this harsh environment. There are already some indications that this is the case for some species, as climatic changes have been implicated in affecting the local population density and distribution of the two vascular plant species (Deschampsia antarctica and Colobanthus quitensis) that occur along the Antarctic Peninsula. In addition, their reproductive patterns have also changed, with a greater incidence of successful sexual reproduction and increased seed output [59]. Invasion of new species and shifts in species composition of communities are also predicted to occur [1012] but yet to be observed.

Longer periods above biological thresholds are likely to affect the life cycle of cryptogams in the context of growth rates, development and reproduction [13]. Warming of the soil and air may therefore increase the abundance and cover of mosses and lichens due to its influences on these life history traits [1416]. However, warming may also influence water availability which might have a negative effect on cryptogam development depending on the rate of evaporation or melting of snow and ice. Arctic studies have shown that cryptogams can decrease in abundance and biomass due to warming [1721], in most cases as a result of increased cover and competition from vascular plants [22]. As vascular plants are very restricted in the Antarctic, the main response here to increased temperatures will be one of the cryptogams alone.

We studied the responses of Maritime Antarctic plant communities to temperature change by using two complementary methods: (1) Studies at three field locations, ranging from the cold temperate oceanic Falkland Islands to southern Maritime Antarctic Anchorage Island, spanning a natural latitudinal and environmental gradient. This 'climate change by location substitution' can be seen as a proxy for the possible long-term effect of warming on the Antarctic vegetation. In this context, we consider the Falklands Islands as an analogue for extremely warmed Maritime Antarctic Islands. (2) Investigations using multi-year field experiments at each of the three locations, where temperature was experimentally manipulated using Open Top Chambers (OTCs) (Fig. 1) [23].

Figure 1
figure 1

OTC in situ at Signy Island.


Environmental data

The Falkland Islands was the warmest of the three locations with the highest temperature, measured at 5 cm above the soil surface. Signy and Anchorage Island had lower and similar annual average temperatures. However, Signy Island had a lower summer temperature than Anchorage Island (Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). At the Falkland Islands, there was a negative relationship between soil temperature and soil moisture (r2 = 0.64, P < 0.001, n = 25) in the dwarf shrub community (Fig. 8). On Signy (Fig. 9 and 10) and Anchorage Island (Fig. 11) the relation between temperature and soil moisture was non-linear. Therefore, we had to apply a generalised additive model with a Gaussian distribution. When the soil was deep frozen, the measured soil moisture approached zero, but when the temperature rose above -3.0°C, there was a linear increase in soil moisture with increasing temperature (r2 = 0.70, P < 0.001, n = 24). Warming treatment had no effect on this relationship. Total rainfall during the 2004/05 year was 9% lower than the average (575 mm y-1) at the Falkland Islands (data obtained from the Falkland Islands Department of Agriculture). The main difference in rainfall occurred during February, with 30 mm less than average.

Figure 2
figure 2

Temperature graph of dwarf shrub vegetation on the Falkland Islands. The monthly mean, maximum and minimum temperature at 5 cm above the soil in the control and OTC plots of the dwarf shrub vegetation on the Falkland Islands. A: ambient temperature in control plots, OTC: Temperature in OTC. n = 3 for each monthly value, error bars indicate se. Data represent period between November 2003 and November 2005.

Figure 3
figure 3

Temperature graph of grass vegetation on the Falkland Islands. The monthly mean, maximum and minimum temperature at 5 cm above the soil in the control and OTC plots of the grass vegetation on the Falkland Islands. A: ambient temperature in control plots, OTC: Temperature in OTC. n = 3 for each monthly value, error bars indicate se. Data represent period between November 2003 and November 2005.

Figure 4
figure 4

Temperature graph of moss vegetation on Signy Island. The monthly mean, maximum and minimum temperature at 5 cm above the soil in the control and OTC plots of the moss vegetation on Signy Island. A: ambient temperature in control plots, OTC: Temperature in OTC. n = 3 for each monthly value, error bars indicate se. Data represent period between November 2003 and November 2005.

Figure 5
figure 5

Temperature graph of lichen vegetation on Signy Island. The monthly mean, maximum and minimum temperature at 5 cm above the soil in the control and OTC plots of the lichen vegetation on Signy Island. A: ambient temperature in control plots, OTC: Temperature in OTC. n = 3 for each monthly value, error bars indicate se. Data represent period between November 2003 and November 2005.

Figure 6
figure 6

Temperature graph of moss vegetation on Anchorage Island. The monthly mean, maximum and minimum temperature at 5 cm above the soil in the control and OTC plots of the moss vegetation on Anchorage Island. A: ambient temperature in control plots, OTC: Temperature in OTC. n = 3 for each monthly value, error bars indicate se. Data represent period between November 2003 and November 2005.

Figure 7
figure 7

Temperature graph of lichen vegetation on Anchorage Island. The monthly mean, maximum and minimum temperature at 5 cm above the soil in the control and OTC plots of the lichen vegetation on Anchorage Island. A: ambient temperature in control plots, OTC: Temperature in OTC. n = 3 for each monthly value, error bars indicate se. Data represent period between November 2003 and November 2005.

Figure 8
figure 8

Temperature soil moisture relationship Falkland Islands. Relation between soil temperature and soil moisture in the dwarf shrub vegetation on the Falkland Islands. Data points represent monthly mean values of the period November 2003 till November 2005 from the control plots.

Figure 9
figure 9

Temperature soil moisture relationship Signy Island. Relation between soil temperature and soil moisture in the moss vegetation on Signy Island. Data points represent monthly mean values of the period November 2003 till November 2005 from the control plots.

Figure 10
figure 10

Temperature soil moisture relationship Signy Island. Relation between soil temperature and soil moisture in the lichen vegetation on Signy Island. Data points represent monthly mean values of the period November 2003 till November 2005 from the control plots.

Figure 11
figure 11

Temperature soil moisture relationship Anchorage Island. Relation between soil temperature and soil moisture in the moss vegetation on Anchorage Island. Data points represent monthly mean values of the period November 2003 till November 2005 from the control plots.

Effects of OTC deployment

Table 1 summarises the effects of OTC deployment on temperature. Annual mean temperature increase at 5 cm height was on average 0.7°C (P < 0.05) higher in OTCs in all communities. However, there were differences between seasons and communities in the amount of warming achieved. Maximum and minimum temperatures were differently affected between the communities during summer and winter months as shown in Table 1 and Fig. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Table 2 summarises the effect of OTC deployment on PAR, soil moisture and relative humidity. PAR was reduced (p < 0.05) in the OTCs on a yearly basis only. Soil moisture, based on TDR measurements, was reduced (p < 0.05) in the OTCs during summer and annually. Gravimetric determination of soil moisture indicated a marginally (P < 0.06) lower water value in the OTCs (26.7 ± 2.2 vs. 17.9 ± 2.5) of the grass community at the Falkland Islands. Relative humidity was reduced (P < 0.01) in OTCs only during summer.

Table 1 Effect of Open Top Chambers on air temperature
Table 2 Effect of Open Top Chambers on light, soil moisture and humidity

Vegetation composition

Tables 3, 4 and 5 list the species present in the study plots at each location. Both at Signy and Anchorage Island total species number was lower (P < 0.05) in the moss communities (3 ± 1) than the lichen communities (7 ± 1). However, they did not differ between the grass and the dwarf shrub communities at the Falkland Islands (Table 6). Species composition (expressed as evenness) did not differ between communities (mean of 0.7 ± 0.1). At the Falklands, vegetation cover in the dwarf shrub community (95 ± 1%) was higher (P < 0.001) than in the more open structured grass community (39 ± 5%). Moss communities at respectively Signy and Anchorage Island had a higher (P < 0.001) total cover (99 ± 0 and 83 ± 5%) than the more open structured lichen communities (87 ± 3 and 57 ± 6 %). Despite the clear difference in growth form dominance, there were no significant differences in overall species diversity between the communities. All had a diversity index of around 1.0 (Table 6).

Table 3 Vegetation composition at the Falkland Islands study sites
Table 4 Vegetation composition at the Signy Island study sites
Table 5 Vegetation composition at the Anchorage Island study sites
Table 6 Plant diversity at the study sites and after warming

There was no change in vegetation diversity due to OTC deployment over the study period at any of the locations. The increase in diversity in the control plots of the grass community at the Falkland Islands (Table 6) was due to a shift in the evenness between species, which was higher (P < 0.05) in the control plots in 2005 (0.9 ± 0.02) than in 2003 (0.5 ± 0.07). Total vegetation cover, after two years of warming, was reduced in the grass community at the Falkland Islands (P < 0.05) and marginally reduced in the lichen (P < 0.06) community at Signy Island (Fig. 12), but no significant changes were apparent in the other communities at any location. At the individual species level no significant effects of the OTC deployment were detected. However, three species almost completely disappeared from both the control plots and OTCs over the course of the study in the Falkland Islands grass community. Festuca magellanica decreased by 91.0% in the control plots and 98.7% in the OTCs. Poa annua decreased by 98.7% and 100%, and Aira praecox by 87.5% and 100%, from the control plots and OTCs respectively. The lack of significance despite these apparently large changes was due to high variability and relatively low replication in this specific community (n = 3). At Signy Island and Anchorage Island, none of the individual species showed a significant response to the OTCs.

Figure 12
figure 12

Vegetation cover change after warming. Total vegetation cover change, after 3 seasons of warming. n = 9 for the dwarf shrub and n = 3 for the grass communities on the Falkland Islands. The four communities at the Maritime Antarctic Islands all have n = 6. * indicates significant differences (p < 0.05 Tukey HSD) between OTC and control plots (') indicates a marginal difference (p < 0.1), error bars are se.


Experimental design

To our knowledge, this is the first study in this region that has explicitly examined the response of the vegetation to experimental warming and compared this response across different communities at different latitudes. However, even though our three research locations were evenly spaced in terms of latitude, they were not spaced evenly in terms of the environmental conditions experienced. There was a much greater contrast between the Falkland Islands and the two Maritime Antarctic locations than there was between the latter. This difference is also reflected in the completely different native vegetation composition. However, despite these differences, total species diversity did not differ between the communities. The climatic differences between Signy Island and Anchorage Island are most likely related to the lower insolation at Signy Island [24].

We consider the Falkland Islands as a possible analogue for extremely warmed maritime Antarctic Islands. However, at present the plant species composition at the Falklands is completely different from that at the maritime Antarctic Islands. The almost complete absence of vascular plants in the maritime Antarctic locations can be attributed to the current climatic extremes and migration barriers for vascular plants [2527]. As plants respond to climatic extremes rather than to climatic averages, the chances for successful establishment in a climate that is becoming warmer may be severely constrained by the occurrence of extreme conditions [2830]. The recent colonisation of 'new' vascular plants on sub-Antarctic islands most likely has an anthropogenic cause [10, 31]. These islands are the first stepping stones for new colonisers as the climate is less harsh than along the Antarctic Peninsula and the main continental landmass. Amelioration of the climate is expected to increase the chances for vascular plants to colonize the Antarctic Peninsula region. However, successful establishment will be hampered by the occurrence of extreme events such as droughts and summer freezing events.

The effect of experimental warming on vegetation

Temperature and soil moisture were prominently affected by the OTCs. Relative humidity measures were slightly reduced during summer and a reduction in PAR receipt was detected on a yearly timescale only. This was most likely due to the lower zenith angle of the sun at these high latitudes. During the summer months, no effect of OTCs on PAR levels was apparent. Any important influences of OTCs on plant and cryptogam growth are therefore likely to be underlain by the warming experienced during the summer months and the reduction in soil moisture. These changes in the environmental conditions caused by the OTCs' for the vegetation resemble the current and predicted future changes for the Antarctic Peninsula region [32]. Although it has to be noted that precipitation changes are harder to predict. To counteract any soil water loss due to higher temperature, increasing precipitation would be required. However, the temporal variability of increased precipitation is even harder to predict and to study this effect, would require a far more elaborate experimental scheme, similar to that used by Dorrepaal et al. [15]. Given that the predicted temperature changes are the most reliable of Global Change Models, the use of the current OTCs allowed us to study the direct effects of a temperature increase, including increased evaporation, on the vegetation. In contrast to other methodologies, i.e., smaller and closed chambers, where temperature increases might have been more effective but resulted in unwanted side effects [23, 33].

The more open structured communities (lichen and grass) appeared to be more responsive, in terms of temperature increase, to this passive warming than the more closed communities, which probably are better capable of buffering for such environmental perturbations. This is probably the reason why the strongest responses were found in these open structured communities. Total vegetation cover was negatively affected by OTCs' in the grass community at the Falkland Islands and the lichen community at Signy Island. Other than the study of Kennedy [34], the consequences of environmental change for lichen dominated vegetation have not been addressed experimentally in the Antarctic, while at Arctic sites most responses of lichen species to experimental warming have been attributed to the negative (competitive) consequences of increases in vascular plants [22]. As vascular plants were absent from our Antarctic study sites, other factors must underlie the response seen in these lichens. The carbon balance of Antarctic lichens is highly dependent on tissue moisture [35]. This suggests the possibility of drought stress due to the warming treatment at Signy Island, as reflected in the soil moisture and humidity data, and proposed in a different methodology screen manipulation study by Convey et al.[36]. That a similar response was not found at Anchorage Island might relate to the nature of the substratum – at Signy Island there is some development of a shallow layer of mineral soil which may provide some water holding capacity, while the lichens at Anchorage Island mainly grow directly on the rock substratum. The lichen species at Anchorage Island are perhaps adapted to more stressful environmental drought conditions and might therefore respond only after prolonged changes in environmental conditions. Increased drought stress is also likely to underlie the vegetation cover decrease seen in OTCs in the grass community of the Falkland Islands.

Both overall diversity measures and individual species data were not significantly affected by the OTCs. However, two grass species (Poa annua and Aira praecox) on the Falkland Islands did disappear within the OTCs after two years of warming. Festuca magellanica also almost disappeared from the OTCs but these three species also showed a very large decline in the control plots. The summer of 2004/05 was relatively dry compared to previous years on the Falkland Islands. Although this is probably not an extreme event for such ecosystems, in combination with the temperature increase it might have led to increased stress for these species. Therefore, germination during the 2005 spring may have been inhibited due to the previous 'drier' period [37, 38] in combination with the extra warming.

Previous warming studies in the Arctic have stimulated increases in above ground vegetation biomass [9, 3942]. However, decreases and shifts in community composition as a result of warming have also been reported [14, 22, 43, 44]. The small response of the communities examined in this study may be related to the small increase in mean temperatures achieved in the OTCs, and the relatively short duration of the experiment (even though few environmental manipulation studies involve continuous multi-season deployment). Also, the vegetation responses described in the previous studies focused mainly on vascular plants. In contrast, the current study focused solely on cryptogamic species at the Maritime Antarctic locations. These species have a much lower rate of growth compared to vascular plants, and measurable responses in abundance may need more time to develop than was available in the duration of this study [28]. That the dwarf shrub community on the Falkland Islands did not show any responses is most likely a result of the relative short duration, low temperature increase and perhaps dry microclimate of the community. Similar studies in the sub-Arctic generally do show responses in dwarf shrub communities after warming [39, 40] but these generally generate a higher temperature increase, lasted longer and most likely had a different soil moisture regime. Nevertheless, the observation that the experimental manipulations during 3 growing seasons of the current study were sufficient to generate some detectable responses may indicate that these communities are susceptible to climate change over a longer time period.


Our (short-term) results indicate that even small temperature increases will most likely have a negative effect on the more open vegetation types such as grass and lichen communities. These more open communities may probably face greater difficulties in handling 'extreme' events such as drier periods. The more dense plant communities of dwarf shrubs and mosses, while experiencing changes in temperature and soil moisture through experimental manipulation, showed no detectable response during this study. This indicates that initial responses might be low. Vegetation development along the Antarctic Peninsula will depend on the gradual amelioration of local conditions through increasing mean temperatures, while changes in the frequency or magnitude of extreme climatic events and the dispersal barriers for vascular plants and cryptogams may prove to be a greater barrier for new species settlement.


Study sites

The study took place at the Falkland Islands (51°76'S 59°03'W), Signy Island (60°71'S 45°59'W) and Anchorage Island (67°61'S 68°22'W) (Fig. 13) over a period of 3 growing seasons between 2003 and 2006. Experimental manipulations were installed in coastal communities in two dominant vegetation types available at the three locations. We explicitly chose coastal communities, as those are the only extensive macroscopic vegetation types present in the Antarctic Peninsula region. As a result these were inevitably different at the Falklands and the two Maritime Antarctic locations. The sites selected included moss or lichen dominated communities on the Maritime Antarctic islands and grass or dwarf shrub communities on the Falkland Islands [2, 45]. The communities on each island lie less than 100 m apart.

Figure 13
figure 13

Map of the three field locations.

The Falkland Islands vegetation is dominated by grasses and dwarf shrubs, due to exposure to typically high winds and low precipitation [45]. The Falkland Islands do not experience prolonged periods with snow cover. The study site here was at Saladero Farm, south-west of Brenton Loch, near the settlement of Goose Green on East Falkland (51°7567'S 59°0298'W). The two communities selected for sampling and manipulation were dwarf shrub dominated vegetation (dominance of Empetrum rubrum Vahl ex Willd.) and a rocky, grass dominated, vegetation (co-dominance of Festuca magellanica Lam., Poa annua L. and P. pratensis L.). The two communities are on a small peninsula on the shore of Brenton Loch, 1–2 m above sea level. The dwarf shrub community grows on a 30–50 cm layer of peat. A very thin layer of soil on top of the rocky base layer, mainly sandstone, underlies the grass community.

Signy Island is a small (10 km2) island, within the northern Maritime Antarctic South Orkney Islands (60°71'S 45°59'W). The island has an ice cap giving rise to glaciers flowing towards the sea. During the summer months, December – February, up to c. 50% of the island's area becomes free of snow and ice, and has a well developed moss or lichen vegetation [46]. The study site on Signy Island was on the north facing 'back slope' area, near to the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) Signy Research Station. Where moss was present at this site, this community was dominated by Polytrichum strictum Brid. and Chorisodontium aciphyllum (Hook. f. & Wils.) Broth in Engl. The moss had a depth of approximately 20 cm underlain by a base layer of quartz-mica-schist [47]. The lichen community was present on a substratum of a similar rock type but did not develop complete vegetation cover while more weathering of the basal layer had occurred. It was dominated by Usnea antarctica Du Rietz.

Anchorage Island lies in Marguerite Bay (southern Maritime Antarctic) south of the BAS Rothera Research Station (67°61'S 68°22'W). The island is 2.5 km long and 500 m wide and is partly covered by semi-permanent snow and ice fields, although recently these have been decreasing rapidly in extent [48]. The island includes several rocky ridges and reaches a maximum height of 57 m asl. On the slopes of these ridges, there are patches of the moss Sanionia uncinata (Hedw.) Loeske and the grass Deschampsia antarctica Desv. However, the dominant vegetation consists of lichens, with Usnea antarctica being most prominent. The communities chosen for sampling and manipulation were dominated by Sanionia uncinata or by Usnea antarctica. The former consisted of patches (2–4 m2) of complete moss coverage located between rocks. A layer of dead moss of 0–10 cm underlies this vegetation. The lichen-dominated community consisted of bare rock and boulders with a partial coverage of U. antarctica and other lichen species.

Experimental warming with Open Top Chambers

At each site, Open Top Chambers (OTCs) (Fig. 1) were placed on the soil surface to raise the air and soil temperature. The structure was based on the ITEX six sided model used extensively in Arctic climate manipulation studies [23, 49, 50]. OTCs were 0.5 m high and measured 1.8 m from opposite corners and 1.6 m from opposite sides at the top. For each community on Signy and Anchorage Islands, 6 plots of 2 × 4 m were chosen based on the visual similarity of vegetation. At the Falkland Islands, 9 plots were selected in the dwarf shrub community and, due to practical constraints, only 3 plots in the grass community. Each of these plots was divided into two sections, one in which the OTC was installed, and a neighbouring section acting as the control plot for that specific OTC, as in a split plot design. The placement of OTC and control plots was made randomly to avoid any possible consistent effects of OTCs on the neighbouring control plots by wind or snow. However, we were not able to measure wind speeds and snow accumulation during winter in and around the plots as the sites were not accessible.

Environmental data recording

Environmental monitoring was undertaken at each of the three study locations, with sensors placed in three paired plots of each community. Air temperature at 5 cm, soil moisture (Water Content Reflectometer CS616, Campbell Scientific UK), air humidity (HMP45C Campbell Scientific UK) and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) (SKP215 Campbell Scientific UK) were recorded every hour for the duration of the experiment. Due to the nature of the substratum, we were unable to place a Water Content Reflectometer to measure soil moisture in the grass community on the Falkland Islands. Therefore, this was determined gravimetrically, on one occasion during the summer of 2005 to indicate whether any differences existed between OTCs and control plots in this community. We did not measure this in the lichen community at Anchorage Island as the lichens were growing on rocks. A self-registering heated precipitation gauge (PLUVIO, OTT Hydrometrie) was installed at each location, to compare the yearly amount of precipitation with that of long-term means. At the three islands these are: 575, 400 and 500 mm y-1 for the Falkland Islands, Signy and Anchorage Island respectively [51, 52]. However, we did not obtain a reliable figure due to technical problems with maintaining sufficient battery power for the gauge on Signy and Anchorage Island.

Vegetation recording

The abundance of higher plants and cryptogams was estimated using the point-intercept method [53]. We used a square frame of 30 × 30 cm with holes every 2.5 cm through which a pin (4 mm diameter) could be inserted vertically until it touched the ground. A "hit" was recorded when the pin touched a part of a plant, with a maximum of 10 hits per plant per pin. Moss and lichen species were recorded as present or absent for each point in the frame. Because more than one species could be hit by each pin, the sum of vegetation cover could exceed 100%. These measurements were made during three consecutive field seasons. The vegetation at the Falkland Islands field sites was identified following Moore [45], and that of Signy and Anchorage Islands using Ochyra [54] and Bednarek-Ochyra et al. [55]. Lichen identifications were confirmed by D. Øvstedal and R. Lewis Smith. During each season of the study, the Falkland Islands were visited during November, Signy Island during December, and Anchorage Island between late January and early February.

Statistical analyses

During the measuring period from November 2003 to February 2006 there were occasional gaps in the data set obtained due to technical problems. Therefore we used environmental data collected between December 2004 and November 2005, as this provided a complete year-round dataset for all three sites. The patterns observed over the duration of the sampling were similar to the period used for analyses. The existence of differences in environmental data between communities was examined using a repeated-measures ANOVA between the six communities with treatment (OTC vs. control plots) within a plot as a within-subject factor. Analyses were completed using annual means and seasonal (summer; Dec-Feb, autumn; Mar-May, winter; Jun-Aug and spring; Sep-Nov) means. Log transformations were applied where appropriate to reduce the variance of the residuals. However, for the temperature data, this transformation was inappropriate, and the non-homogeneity of variances could not be resolved. Therefore, data obtained from the Falkland Islands communities was tested separately from that obtained from the four Maritime Antarctic communities. Post-hoc (Tukey HSD) tests were used to test for differences between communities. To identify any relationship between soil moisture and soil temperature a linear regression model was applied. Analyses were completed using the package Brodgar 2.5 and Statistica.

Diversity was estimated using Shannon's diversity index (H), calculated as:

H = i = 1 S p i ln p i MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xI8qiVKYPFjYdHaVhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9vqFj0dXdbba91qpepeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGaemisaGKaeyypa0JaeyOeI0YaaabCaeaacqWGWbaCdaWgaaWcbaGaemyAaKgabeaakiGbcYgaSjabc6gaUjabdchaWnaaBaaaleaacqWGPbqAaeqaaaqaaiabdMgaPjabg2da9iabigdaXaqaaiabdofatbqdcqGHris5aaaa@3E94@

Where H = Shannon's diversity index, S = total number of species in the community (richness) and P = proportion of S made up of the i th species.

Evenness (E) was calculated by dividing the H by the natural logarithm of the number of species.

The diversity indices obtained across community types and treatments were also analysed using repeated measures ANOVA. For the analyses of diversity change after two years, the individual plot diversity index obtained in 2003/04 was subtracted from that obtained in 2005/06 to give a measure of the net change in diversity (if any). Total vegetation cover (calculated as percentage of point intercept hits with plants of the total number (121) of points in the quadrant) total number of hits with change was analysed in a similar way for the difference between 2003/04 and 2005/06. However, again there was non-homogeneity of variance in the data that could not be resolved by a mathematical transformation. Therefore, a one-way ANOVA between the control and OTC plots was employed to analyse the change in cover, separately for each community. The differences in total hits per plot obtained for each species between 2003/04 and 2005/06 were also analysed using a repeated measures ANOVA as described above.


  1. Castello M, Nimis PL: Diversity of lichens in Antarctica. Antarctic Communities Species, Structure and Survival. Edited by: Battaglia B, Valencia J, Walton DWH. 1997, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15-21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Convey P: Antarctic Ecosystems. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. 2001, 1: 171-184. 10.1006/rwbd.1999.0012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Convey P: Antarctic Climate Change and its influences on terrestrial ecosystems. Trends in Antarctic terrestrial and limnetic Ecosystems: Antarctica as a Global Indicator. Edited by: Bergstrom DM, Convey P, Huiskes A. 2007, Kluwer Academic Publishers the Netherlands, 253-272.

    Google Scholar 

  4. van den Broeke MR, van Lipzig NPM: Changes in Antarctic temperature, wind and precipitation in response to the Antarctic Oscillation. Annals of Glaciology. 2004, 39: 119-126. 10.3189/172756404781814654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fowbert JA, Smith RIL: Rapid Population Increases in Native Vascular Plants in the Argentine Islands, Antarctic Peninsula. Arctic and Alpine Research. 1994, 26 (3): 290-296. 10.2307/1551941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith RIL: Vascular Plants as Bioindicators of Regional Warming in Antarctica. Oecologia. 1994, 99 (3–4): 322-328. 10.1007/BF00627745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Convey P: Reproduction of Antarctic flowering plants. Antarctic Science. 1996, 8 (2): 127-134. 10.1017/S0954102096000193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grobe CW, Ruhland CT, Day TA: A new population of Colobanthus quitensis near Arthur Harbor, Antarctica: Correlating recruitment with warmer summer temperatures. Arctic and Alpine Research. 1997, 29 (2): 217-221. 10.2307/1552049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Day TA, Ruhland CT, Grobe CW, Xiong F: Growth and reproduction of Antarctic vascular plants in response to warming and UV radiation reductions in the field. Oecologia. 1999, 119 (1): 24-35. 10.1007/s004420050757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frenot Y, Chown SL, Whinam J, Selkirk PM, Convey P, Skotnicki M, Bergstrom DM: Biological invasions in the Antarctic: extent, impacts and implications. Biological reviews. 2005, 80: 45-72. 10.1017/S1464793104006542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gremmen NJM, Smith VR: New records of alien vascular plants from Marion and Prince Edward Islands, sub-Antarctic. Polar Biology. 1999, 21 (6): 401-409. 10.1007/s003000050380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stevens MI, Hogg ID: Expanded distributional records of Collembola and Acari in southern Victoria land, Antarctica. Pedobiologia. 2002, 46 (5): 485-495. 10.1078/0031-4056-00154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Green TGA, Schroeter B, Sancho LG: Plant life in Antarctica. Handbook of plant Ecology. Edited by: Pugneres FI, Valladeres F. 1999, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arft AM, Walker MD, Gurevitch J, Alatalo JM, Bret-Harte MS, Dale M, Diemer M, Gugerli F, Henry GHR, Jones MH, et al: Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: Meta- analysis of the international tundra experiment. Ecological Monographs. 1999, 69 (4): 491-511.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dorrepaal E, Aerts R, Cornelissen JHC, Callaghan TV, van Logtestijn RSP: Summer warming and increased winter snow cover affect Sphagnum fuscum growth, structure and production in a sub-arctic bog. Global Change Biology. 2004, 10 (1): 93-104. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00718.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sonesson M, Carlsson BA, Callaghan TV, Halling S, Bjorn LO, Bertgren M, Johanson U: Growth of two peat-forming mosses in subarctic mires: species interactions and effects of simulated climate change. Oikos. 2002, 99 (1): 151-160. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990115.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chapin FS, Shaver GR, Giblin AE, Nadelhoffer KJ, Laundre JA: Responses of Arctic Tundra to Experimental and Observed Changes in Climate. Ecology. 1995, 76 (3): 694-711. 10.2307/1939337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Press MC, Potter JA, Burke MJW, Callaghan TV, Lee JA: Response of a subarctic dwarf shrub heath community to simulated environmental change. Journal of Ecology. 1998, 86: 315-327. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00261.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jonsdottir IS, Magnusson B, Gudmundsson J, Elmarsdottir A, Hjartarson H: Variable sesitivity of plant communities in Iceland to experimental warming. Global Change Biology. 2005, 11: 553-563. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00928.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Klanderud K, Totland O: Simulated climate change altered dominance hierarchies and diversity of an alpine biodiversity hotspot. Ecology. 2005, 86 (8): 2047-2054. 10.1890/04-1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wahren CHA, Walker MD, Bret-Harte MS: Vegetation responses in Alaskan arctic tundra after 8 years of a summer warming and a winter snow manipulation experiment. Global Change Biology. 2005, 11: 537-552. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00927.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cornelissen JHC, Callaghan TV, Alatalo JM, Michelsen A, Graglia E, Hartley AE, Hik DS, Hobbie SE, Press MC, Robinson CH, et al: Global change and arctic ecosystems: is lichen decline a function of increases in vascular plant biomass?. Journal of Ecology. 2001, 89 (6): 984-994. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2001.00625.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marion GM, Henry GHR, Freckman DW, Johnstone J, Jones G, Jones MH, Levesque E, Molau U, Molgaard P, Parsons AN, et al: Open-top designs for manipulating field temperature in high-latitude ecosystems. Global Change Biology. 1997, 3: 20-32. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.1997.gcb136.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Longton RE: Vegetation in the maritime Antarctic. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences. 1967, 252: 213-235. 10.1098/rstb.1967.0014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Convey P: The influence of environmental characteristics on life history attributes of antarctic terrestrial biota. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 1996, 71: 191-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kennedy AD: Modeling the determinants of species distributions in Antarctica. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research. 1999, 31 (3): 230-241. 10.2307/1552251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Peck LS, Convey P, Barnes DKA: Environmental constraints on life histories in Antarctic ecosystems: tempos, timings and predictability. Biological reviews. 2006, 81: 75-109. 10.1017/S1464793105006871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Robinson SA, Wasley J, Tobin AK: Living on the edge – plants and global change in continental and maritime Antarctica. Global Change Biology. 2003, 9 (12): 1681-1717. 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00693.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Peer L, Nijs I, Reheul D, De Cauwer B: Species richness and susceptibility to heat and drought extremes in synthesized grassland ecosystems: compositional vs physiological effects. Functional Ecology. 2004, 18 (6): 769-778. 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00901.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Marchand FL, Kockelbergh F, van de Vijver B, Beyens L, Nijs I: Are heat and cold resistance of arctic species affected by successive extreme temperature events?. New Phytologist. 2006, 170 (2): 291-300. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01659.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Longton RE: Growth and Productivity of the Moss Polytrichum alpestre Hoppe in Antarctic Regions. Antarctic ecology. Edited by: Holdgate MW. 1970, London: Academic Press, 2: 818-837.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Turner J, Colwell SR, Marshall GJ, Lachlan-Cope TA, Carleton AM, Jones PD, Lagun V, Reid PA, Iagovkina S: Antarctic climate change during the last 50 years. International journal of Climatology. 2005, 25: 279-294. 10.1002/joc.1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kennedy AD: Temperature Effects of Passive Greenhouse Apparatus in High- Latitude Climate-Change Experiments. Functional Ecology. 1995, 9 (2): 340-350. 10.2307/2390583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kennedy AD: Antarctic fellfield response to climate change: A tripartite synthesis of experimental data. Oecologia. 1996, 107 (2): 141-150. 10.1007/BF00327897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schroeter B, Olech M, Kappen L, Heitland W: Ecophysiological Investigations of Usnea-Antarctica in the Maritime Antarctic .1. Annual Microclimatic Conditions and Potential Primary Production. Antarctic Science. 1995, 7 (3): 251-260. 10.1017/S0954102095000356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Convey P, Pugh PJA, Jackson C, Murray AW, Ruhland CT, Xiong FS, Day TA: Response of antarctic terrestrial microarthropods to long-term climate manipulations. Ecology. 2002, 83 (11): 3130-3140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Allen PS, White DB, Markhart DB: Germination of perennial ryegrass and annual bluegrass seeds subjected to hydration-dehydration cycles. Crop Science. 1993, 33 (5): 1020-1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Debaenegill SB, Allen PS, White DB: Dehydration of Germinating perennial ryegrass seeds can alter rate of subsequent radicle emergence. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1994, 45: 1301-1307. 10.1093/jxb/45.9.1301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Parsons AN, Welker JM, Wookey PA, Press MC, Callaghan TV, Lee JA: Growth-Responses of 4 Sub-Arctic Dwarf Shrubs to Simulated Environmental-Change. Journal of Ecology. 1994, 82 (2): 307-318. 10.2307/2261298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hobbie SE, Chapin FS: Response of tundra plant biomass, aboveground production, nitrogen, and CO2 flux to experimental warming. Ecology. 1998, 79 (5): 1526-1544.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rustad LE, Campbell JL, Marion GM, Norby RJ, Mitchell MJ, Hartley AE, Cornelissen JHC, Gurevitch J: A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia. 2001, 126 (4): 543-562. 10.1007/s004420000544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Aerts R, Cornelissen JHC, Dorrepaal E: Plant performance in a warmer world: General responses of plants from cold, northern biomes and the importance of winter and spring events. Plant Ecology. 2006, 182 (1–2): 65-77. 10.1007/s11258-005-9031-1.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Weltzin JF, Pastor J, Harth C, Bridgham SD, Updegraff K, Chapin CT: Response of bog and fen plant communities to warming and water- table manipulations. Ecology. 2000, 81 (12): 3464-3478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. van Wijk MT, Clemmensen KE, Shaver GR, Williams M, Callaghan TV, Chapin FS, Cornelissen JHC, Gough L, Hobbie SE, Jonasson S, et al: Long-term ecosystem level experiments at Toolik Lake, Alaska, and at Abisko, Northern Sweden: generalizations and differences in ecosystem and plant type responses to global change. Global Change Biology. 2004, 10 (1): 105-123. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00719.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Moore DM: The vascular Flora of the Falkland Islands. British Antarctic Survey Scientific Reports. 1968, 60-

    Google Scholar 

  46. Smith RIL: Vegetation of the South Orkney Islands with particular reference to Signy Island. British Antarctic Survey Scientific Reports. 1972, 68-

    Google Scholar 

  47. Matthews DH, Maling DH: The Geology of the South Orkney Islands. Falkland Islands Dependencies Survey, Scientific Reports. 1967, 25-

    Google Scholar 

  48. Fox AJ, Cooper APR: Climate-change indicators from archival aerial photography of the Antarctic Peninsula. Annals of Glaciology. 1998, 27: 636-642.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Molau U, Molgaard P: ITEX Manual second edition. 1996, Denmark: Danish Polar Center

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hollister RD, Webber PJ: Biotic validation of small open-top chambers in a tundra ecosystem. Global Change Biology. 2000, 6 (7): 835-842. 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00363.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Holdgate MW: Signy Island. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences. 1967, 252 (777): 173-177. 10.1098/rstb.1967.0008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Turner J, Lachlan-Cope TA, Marshall GJ, Morris EM, Mulvaney R, Winter W: Spatial variability of Antarctic Peninsula net surface mass balance. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres. 2002, 107 (D13):

  53. Jonasson S: Evaluation of the point intercept method for the estimation of plant biomass. OIKOS. 1988, 52: 101-106. 10.2307/3565988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ochyra R: The moss flora of King George Island, Antarctica. 1998, Cracow: Drukarnia Kolejowa

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bednarek-Ochyra H, Vana J, Ochyra R, Smith RIL: The Liverwort Flora of Antarctica. 2000, Cracow: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Acadamy of Sciences

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We are very grateful for the logistical support given by the British Antarctic Survey and the Department of Agriculture of the Falkland Islands Government during the field work. We would like to thank the following for their help in the field: Mark van de Wouw, Hans Francke, John Hobman, Simon Hernimon, Helen Taylor, Merlijn Janssens and Ruben Fijn and especially Kat Snell for maintaining the field site on Anchorage Island during the winter periods. D. Øvstedal and R. Lewis Smith are acknowledged for their help with the identification of the lichen species. This work was financially supported by the Netherlands Polar Programme (NPP-NWO 851.20.016), and forms an output of the SCAR programme "Evolution and Biodiversity in the Antarctic". This manuscript was improved by the comments of four anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stef Bokhorst.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

SB set up the study sites, carried out field sampling and performed statistical analyses. AH contributed to the setting up of the study sites, participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. PC and RA participated in the design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bokhorst, S., Huiskes, A., Convey, P. et al. The effect of environmental change on vascular plant and cryptogam communities from the Falkland Islands and the Maritime Antarctic. BMC Ecol 7, 15 (2007).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: