From: The luxury effect beyond cities: bats respond to socioeconomic variation across landscapes
Species | Variable interaction term | Regression coefficient 95% confidence interval |
---|---|---|
Lasiurus borealis | Income × evergreen forest | 0.0044 to 0.1206 |
Income × mixed forest | − 0.2522 to 0.3651 | |
Income × shrub | − 0.1867 to 0.0051 | |
Lasiurus cinereus | Income × evergreen forest | − 1.8770 to 1.3499 |
Income × shrub | − 1.5448 to 2.0974 | |
Income × grassland/herbaceous | − 1.8732 to 0.9881 | |
Income × pasture/hay | − 2.1516 to 0.0587 | |
Income × woody wetlands | 0.2140 to 2.3580 | |
Income × emergent herbaceous wetlands | − 0.4870 to 2.2350 | |
Nycticeius humeralis | Income × evergreen forest | − 0.1348 to 0.0102 |
Income × shrub | − 0.1485 to 0.0530 | |
Income × woody wetlands | − 0.2713 to 0.0537 |