Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of plant structure on grasshopper trait dissimilarity

From: Plant composition changes in a small-scale community have a large effect on the performance of an economically important grassland pest

Grasshopper traits

Factors

Df

Sum Sq

R2

F value

Pr (> F)

Significance

Male length

Community dissimilarity

7

0.88

0.31

1.39

0.26

 

Residual

22

1.99

0.69

   

Total

29

2.88

1

   

Male mass

Community dissimilarity

7

0.85

0.44

2.46

0.0497

*

Residual

22

1.08

0.56

   

Total

29

1.93

1.00

   

Female length

Community dissimilarity

7

0.18

0.13

0.45

0.869

 

Residual

22

1.24

0.87

   

Total

29

1.42

1.00

   

Female mass

Community dissimilarity

7

0.18

0.13

0.45

0.863

 

Residual

22

1.24

0.87

   

Total

29

1.42

1.00

   

Preference for Sk

Community dissimilarity

7

2.04

0.93

40.68

0.0001

***

Residual

22

0.16

0.07

   

Total

29

2.20

1.00

   

Preference for Lc

Community dissimilarity

7

1.83

0.91

31.12

0.0001

***

Residual

22

0.18

0.09

   

Total

29

2.01

1.00

   

Preference for Af

Community dissimilarity

7

0.88

0.62

5.08

0.0027

**

Residual

22

0.54

0.38

   

Total

29

1.42

1.00

   
  1. Significance analysis based on 9999 permutations
  2. Sk: S. krylovii; Lc: L. chinensis; Af: A. frigida
  3. Statistical significance: ‘***’, 0.001; ‘**’, 0.01; ‘*’, 0.05; ‘.’, 0.1; ‘ ’, 1