Skip to main content

TableĀ 1 Variable names and descriptions and associated hypotheses

From: Rodent-avoidance, topography and forest structure shape territory selection of a forest bird

Hypothesis

Variable

Description

Breeding

Control

Abandoned

Forest structure

Ā Ground variables

Cover of herb layer a

Percentage of ground covered by vegetationĀ <Ā 0.5Ā m, visually estimated

24.2, 10.9ā€“42.6

14.8, 6.4ā€“32.0

25.5, 12.2ā€“29.2

Ā 

Number of tussocks b

Number of grass and sedge tussocks

325.5, 122.8ā€“653.5

40.0, 3.0ā€“216.0

28.5, 0ā€“310.8

Ā 

Number of bushes c

Number of bushesĀ >Ā 0.5Ā m height and number of young trees with dbhĀ <Ā 8Ā cm

38.5, 17.8ā€“70.8

69.0, 12.0ā€“246.0

34.0, 6.8ā€“137.8

Ā Tree variables

Number of trees c

Number of trees with dbhĀ >Ā 8Ā cm

16.5, 13.0ā€“22.0

13.0, 10.0ā€“17.0

11.0, 7.8ā€“14.5

Ā 

Number of trees branchedĀ <Ā 4Ā m c

Number of trees with branches below 4Ā m

10.0, 6.0ā€“14.0

7.0, 4.0ā€“11.0

5.5, 3.8ā€“10.3

Ā 

Number of trees branchedĀ <Ā 10Ā m c

Number of trees with branches below 10Ā m

13.0, 9.0ā€“18.0

9.0, 6.0ā€“13.0

7.0, 6.0ā€“12.0

Ā 

Tree dbh d

Average dbh of all trees with dbhĀ >Ā 8Ā cm

26.0, 22.3ā€“30.0

31.0, 26.0ā€“36.0

27.5, 24ā€“37.5

Ā 

Tree species diversity e

Shannonā€™s index of diversity based on tree species and dbh data

1.2, 0.7ā€“1.5

0.9, 0.7ā€“1.3

0.9, 0.6ā€“1.2

Ā 

Sky visibility d

Percentage of sky visible (see ā€œEstimation of sky visibilityā€ section)

13.0, 9.0ā€“19.0

14.0, 10.0ā€“19.0

10.5, 9.0ā€“21.8

Ā 

Proportion beech e

Number of beech trees divided by total number of trees

43.2, 20.3ā€“59.3

50.0, 29.2ā€“69.6

52.3, 33.3ā€“58.5

Ā 

Proportion other deciduous trees e

Number of deciduous trees except beech divided by total number of trees

31.7, 18.6ā€“47.1

25.0, 14.3ā€“50

41.4, 18.6ā€“53.1

Ā 

Proportion conifers e

Number of coniferous trees divided by total number of trees

13.1, 0ā€“31.7

0, 0ā€“29.4

0, 0ā€“15.4

Rodent-avoidance

Rodent numbers

Number of rodents captured in the 25 traps per territory or control area

8.0, 0ā€“15.8

13.0, 4.0ā€“22.0

7.0, 1.0ā€“13.3

Anthropogenic disturbance

Distance to paths f

Distance to paths, i.e. trails regularly used by humans

48.0, 15.0ā€“75.8

ā€“

37.5, 25.8ā€“45.5

Ā 

Distance to forest edge f

Distance to edge of forest

148.5, 102.8ā€“237.8

153.0, 72.0ā€“224.0

98.5, 60.8ā€“148.5

Topography

Elevation f

Elevation in m above sea level

698, 656ā€“931

699, 610ā€“920

575, 548ā€“740

Ā 

Aspect d

Measured in degrees (o) with a compass in the centre of each 50-m2-square

174, 144ā€“204

171, 127ā€“227

162, 109ā€“307

Ā 

Slope steepness d

Measured in degrees (o) with a compass in the centre of each 50-m2-square

31.5, 27.0ā€“37.0

26.0, 21.0ā€“33.0

21, 16.8ā€“23.5

  1. Shown are medians and interquartile (25ā€“75Ā %) ranges
  2. DbhĀ =Ā diameter at breast height. NĀ =Ā 73 for breeding territories and control areas, respectively, and nĀ =Ā 20 for abandoned territories
  3. a Averaged over the 25 1-m2-squares per breeding territory, per control area and per abandoned territory, respectively
  4. b Summed over the 25 1-m2-squares per breeding territory, per control area and per abandoned territory, respectively
  5. c Summed over the five 50-m2-squares per breeding territory, per control area and per abandoned territory, respectively
  6. d Averaged over the five 50-m2-squares per breeding territory, per control area and per abandoned territory, respectively
  7. e Calculated over the five 50-m2-squares per breeding territory, per control area and per abandoned territory, respectively
  8. f Recorded for the centres of each breeding and abandoned territory and extracted from ecoGIS (www.ecogis.admin.ch)