Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of the corrected Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) for landscape hypotheses within Payuk Lake, Manitoba, Canada

From: How do genes flow? Identifying potential dispersal mode for the semi-aquatic lichen Dermatocarpon luridum using spatial modelling and photobiont markers

Gene

Landscape Hypothesis

Parameters

K

N

AICc

ΔAICc

Weight

Actin

In–Out-Bay

inflow + outflow + mistik + bay

3

51

−40.59

0.51

0.36

Hydrology

mistik + twin + middle + outflow

4

51

−41.11

0.00

0.47

Wind

mistik + twin + wind + outflow

4

51

−38.33

2.78

0.12

Bay Topography

mistik + twin + middle + bay + outflow

5

51

−36.84

4.26

0.06

ITS1

In–Out-Bay

inflow + outflow + mistik + bay

3

79

−70.45

0.49

0.30

Hydrology

mistik + twin + middle + outflow

4

79

−70.07

0.87

0.25

Wind

mistik + twin + wind + outflow

4

79

−70.94

0.00

0.38

Bay Topography

mistik + twin + middle + bay + outflow

5

79

−67.40

3.54

0.07

ITS2

In–Out-Bay

inflow + outflow + mistik + bay

3

79

−55.13

0.32

0.32

Hydrology

mistik + twin + middle + outflow

4

79

−54.13

1.32

0.19

Wind

mistik + twin + wind + outflow

4

79

−55.45

0.00

0.38

Bay Topography

mistik + twin + middle + bay + outflow

5

79

−52.95

2.50

0.11

  1. The genes used were the β-actin protein (Actin) gene and internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS1 and ITS2) of the rDNA gene within lichenized Diplosphaera chodatii
  2. K number of parameters, n sample size, AICc corrected AIC value, ΔAICc difference in the corrected AIC value when compared to the minimum AIC value, and Weight model weights
  3. Significant results are italics