Skip to main content

Table 2 Path coefficients between Pn and environmental factors of Liriope muscari grown under high (HI), medium (MI) and low (LI) incident PAR in two groups

From: Photosynthetic performance and growth responses of Liriope muscari (Decne.) L.H. Bailey (Asparagaceae) planted within poplar forests having different canopy densities

Treatment

Variable

Direct effect

Indirect effect

Decision coefficient

PAR X1

Tleaf X2

RH X3

∑

HI-1

PAR X1

− 0.09

–

0.128

0.684

0.812

− 0.651

 

Tleaf X2

0.154

− 0.075

–

0.830

0.755

− 0.547

 

RH X3

− 0.888

0.069

− 0.144

–

− 0.075

0.783

Regression equation: Y = 7.617 + 0.001 * X1 + 0.049 * X2 − 0.131 * X3

MI-1

PAR X1

0.032

–

− 0.090

0.851

0.760

− 0.577

 

Tleaf X2

− 0.108

0.027

–

0.967

0.993

− 0.975

 

RH X3

− 1.035

− 0.026

0.101

–

0.075

1.066

Regression equation: Y = 9.317 + 0.001 * X1 − 0.032 * X2 − 0.157 * X3

LI-1

PAR X1

0.383

–

0.562

–

0.562

− 0.170

 

Tleaf X2

0.608

0.354

–

–

0.354

0.244

Regression equation: Y = − 1.519 + 0.017 * X1 + 0.152 * X2

HI-2

Tleaf X2

− 3.630

–

–

4.287

4.287

0.657

 

RH X3

− 4.326

–

3.597

–

3.597

− 0.729

Regression equation: Y = 48.844 − 1.044 * X2 − 0.682 * X3

MI-2

PAR X1

1.4

–

− 0.263

− 0.371

− 0.634

1.558

 

Tleaf X2

− 0.279

1.320

–

− 0.377

0.943

− 0.812

 

RH X3

0.384

− 1.354

0.274

–

− 1.080

− 1.019

Regression equation: Y = 0.262 + 0.07 * X1 − 0.094 * X2

LI-2

PAR X1

1.293

–

− 0.314

− 0.141

− 0.456

1.464

 

Tleaf X2

− 0.363

1.120

–

− 0.140

0.980

− 0.828

 

RH X3

0.147

− 1.243

0.346

–

− 0.897

− 0.783

Regression equation: Y = − 0.337 + 0.056 * X1 − 0.091 * X2 + 0.022 * X3