| |
df
|
Springa
|
Summer
|
|---|
|
SS
|
F
|
SS
|
F
|
|---|
|
Explo
|
2
|
0.265
|
0.347n.s.
|
0.392
|
2.02n.s
|
|
LUT
|
2
|
0.250
|
0.327n.s.
|
0.260
|
1.34n.s
|
|
Species richnessb
|
1
|
1.77
|
4.77*
|
0.0177
|
0.182n.s
|
|
Explo:LUT
|
4
| | |
0.342
|
0.883n.s
|
|
Explo:species richness
|
2
| | |
0.0544
|
0.281n.s
|
|
LUT:species richness
|
2
| | |
0.764
|
3.94*
|
|
Explo:LUT:species richness
|
4
| | |
1.125
|
2.90*
|
|
Residuals
| |
9.03
|
(df = 26)
|
2.42
|
(df = 25)
|
- Models were manually simplified until all model terms were significant. Design effects were always kept in the model. SS were computed sequentially (type I). LUT and Explo refer to land-use type and exploratory region, respectively
-
aSpecies richness was modelled as log(species richness) in the spring analysis. Using a linear scale yielded similar, but non-significant effects of species richness
-
bEstimate for the spring effect of log(species richness): 0.792 ± 0.363; partial model R
2adj
= 0.036