Table 3 Univariate linear mixed models
From: Importance of latrine communication in European rabbits shifts along a rural–to–urban gradient
Fixed effects | F | df 1, df 2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|
(a) drel | |||
‘Degree of urbanity’ | 11.13 | 1, 93 | 0.001 |
(b) Latrine-marked area (A) | |||
‘Degree of urbanity’ | 25.49 | 1, 126 | <0.001 |
(c) Latrine dimension (PC on latrine size and numbers of fecal pellets) | |||
‘Degree of urbanity’ | 3.04 | 1, 531 | <0.001 |
‘drel’ | 0.29 | 1, 2960 | 0.589 |
‘drel x degree of urbanity’ | 5.33 | 1, 2870 | <0.001 |
(d) Latrine density | |||
‘Degree of urbanity’ | 10.67 | 1, 190 | 0.001 |
‘drel’ | 34.74 | 1, 2953 | <0.001 |
‘drel x degree of urbanity’ | 5.26 | 1, 2900 | 0.022 |
(e) Numbers of fresh fecal pellets | |||
‘Degree of urbanity’ | 0.77 | 1, 269 | 0.38 |
‘drel’ | 0.91 | 1, 295 | 0.34 |
‘drel x degree of urbanity’ | 0.98 | 1, 521 | 0.32 |
(f) Distance to next woody vegetation | |||
'Degree of urbanity' | 11.31 | 1, 2973 | 0.001 |
'drel' | 354.29 | 1, 2853 | <0.001 |