Skip to main content

TableĀ 3 Estimates, standard errors (SE), and 2.5ā€“97.5Ā % confidence limits based on model-averaging from the across-hypotheses model selection of (A) breeding territories vs. control areas (nĀ =Ā 73 pairs) and (B) breeding territories (nĀ =Ā 56) vs. abandoned territories (nĀ =Ā 20)

From: Rodent-avoidance, topography and forest structure shape territory selection of a forest bird

Hypothesis

Variable

Estimate

SE

2.5Ā %

97.5Ā %

(a) Forest structure

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ground variables

Cover of herb layer (lin. term)

0.98

0.45

0.09

1.87

Ā 

Cover of herb layer (quad. term)

āˆ’0.71

0.28

āˆ’1.25

āˆ’0.16

Ā 

Number of bushes

āˆ’0.58

0.37

āˆ’1.31

0.15

Ā 

Number of tussocks

1.78

0.81

0.18

3.37

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Tree variables

Number of trees

0.94

0.31

0.32

1.55

Ā 

Tree dbh

āˆ’0.48

0.31

āˆ’1.09

0.13

Ā 

Tree species diversity (lin. term)

āˆ’0.22

0.27

āˆ’0.75

0.31

Ā 

Tree species diversity (quad. term)

0.27

0.21

āˆ’0.13

0.67

Ā Ā Ā Ā Topography

Slope steepness

0.91

0.28

0.35

1.46

Ā Ā Ā Ā Rodent-avoidance

Rodent numbers

āˆ’0.60

0.30

āˆ’1.19

āˆ’0.01

(b) Forest structure

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Tree variables

Number of trees

1.72

0.70

0.36

3.09

Ā Ā Ā Ā Disturbance

Distance to forest edge

3.58

1.52

0.60

6.57

Ā Ā Ā Ā Topography

Slope steepness

2.20

0.76

0.71

3.68

  1. Shown are variables included in the highest ranking models and in models with Ī”AICcĀ <Ā 2 to the highest ranking ones
  2. Lin linear; quad quadratic