Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of analysis of species richness and density using bounded quadrats and open quadrats

From: The devil is in the detail: estimating species richness, density, and relative abundance of tropical island herpetofauna

Bounded quadrats

Open quadrats

 

n

Sobs

SChao1

SJack2

α

D

Sobs

SChao1

SJack2

α

D

Lizards

47

7

7 ± 0.03

6.99 ± 0.09

1.07 ± 0.15

15.45 ± 15.55

7

6.32 ± 0.47

6.86 ± 1.64

1.03 ± 0.15

6.15 ± 4.09

Frogs

42

8

7.62 ± 1.58

7.95 ± 2.5

1.25 ± 0.23

7.19 ± 10.24

7

6.19 ± 2.06

7.53 ± 2.84

1.35 ± 0.24

1.31 ± 10.24

  1. Though 49 bounded quadrats were sampled, for the purpose of comparison of estimated species richness, we use a sample size of 47 for lizards because beyond this, the standard deviation of the estimated species richness became zero for jackknife2 estimate. Estimated species richness of frogs is compared at a sample size of 42 as the remaining 7 bounded quadrats were in small islands where no amphibian has ever been recorded. Fisher’s α is compared at a common number of individuals (757 lizards and 188 frogs). The standard deviations for density estimates presented here are unadjusted for sample size difference.
  2. n number of quadrats based on which the estimates were arrived at, S obs observed species richness, S Chao1 Chao1 estimate, S Jack2 second order jackknife estimate, α Fisher’s alpha, D density (individuals/100 m2).