Skip to main content

Table 3 Fixed effects part (year, treatment, and their interaction term) of generalized linear mixed models for abundance (a) and species richness (b) for all areas ( n= 12)

From: The effect of peatland drainage and restoration on Odonata species richness and abundance

  

Estimate

SE

z

cpb

a)

Intercept

−0.77

0.62

−1.25

0.211

 

year (1)

−18.53

1998.18

−0.01

0.993

 

year (3)

2.01

0.47

4.31

<0.001

 

treatment (D)

−0.57

0.82

−0.70

0.485

 

treatment (R)

3.38

0.71

4.79

<0.001

 

year (1):treatment (D)

18.05

1998.18

0.01

0.993

 

year (3):treatment (D)

−1.14

0.62

−1.85

0.064

 

year (1):treatment (R)

17.81

1998.18

0.01

0.993

 

year (3):treatment (R)

−1.96

0.49

−4.02

<0.001

b)

Intercept

−0.83

0.45

−1.85

0.064

 

year (1)

−19.15

248.36

−0.08

0.939

 

year (3)

1.40

0.50

2.78

0.006

 

treatment (D)

−0.41

0.66

−0.62

0.539

 

treatment (R)

1.62

0.48

3.39

0.001

 

year (1):treatment (D)

18.64

248.36

0.08

0.940

 

year (3):treatment (D)

−0.88

0.87

−1.01

0.311

 

year (1):treatment (R)

19.10

248.36

0.08

0.939

 

year (3):treatment (R)

−1.49

0.59

−2.51

0.012

  1. Before restoration and pristine sites are used as baselines. Year (1) = first year after restoration, year (3) = third year after restoration, treatment (D) = drained sites, treatment (R) = restored sites. Random variables = study area, study site; number of observations = 87, residual degrees of freedom = 76.
  2. Number in bold indicate statistically significant results.