Skip to main content

Table 3 ANOVA results comparing E. dispar and E. histolytica spread from four sites of initial infection (Figure 6 )

From: A test of agent-based models as a tool for predicting patterns of pathogen transmission in complex landscapes

Comparison:

F value

p value

Tukey HSD & Distance Category

E. dispar from PU

85.533

<2.2e-16

0-10 km* from 10–20 km, 30–40 km;

10-20 km* from 20–30 km, 40–50 km;

20-30 km* from 30–40 km;

30-40 km* from 40–50 km

E. histolytica from PU

49.84

<2.2e-16

0-10 km* from 10–20 km, 30–40 km;

10-20 km* from 20–30 km, 30–40 km, 40–50 km;

20-30 km* from 30–40 km, 40–50 km;

30-40 km* from 40–50 km

E. dispar from AN

27.74

<2.2e-16

0-10 km* from all other distances;

10-20 km* from all other distances

E. histolytica from AN

16.311

5.773e-16

0-10 km* from all other distances;

10-20 km* from 20–30 km, 30–40 km

E. dispar from AK

57.551

<2.2e-16

0-10 km* from all other distances;

10-20 km* from 30–40 km;

20-30 km* from 30–40 km, 50+;

30-40 km* from 40–50 km

E. histolytica from AK

30.841

<2.2e-16

0-10 km*from all other distances;

10-20 km* from 30–40 km;

20-30 km* from 30–40 km, 50+ km;

30-40 km* from 40–50 km

E. dispar from MK

26.886

<2.2e-16

0-10 km* from 20–30 km, 40–50 km;

10-20 km* from 20–30 km, 40–50 km;

20-30 km* from 30–40 km, 50+ km;

30-40 km* from 40–50 km;

40-50 km* from 50+ km

E. histolytica from MK

30.841

<2.2e-16

0-10 km* from 20–30 km, 40–50 km;

10-20 km* from 20–30 km, 40–50 km;

20-30 km* from 30–40 km, 50+ km;

30-40 km* from 40–50 km;

40-50 km* from 50+ km

  1. Asterisks denote significant differences between distance categories.