From: Rodent-avoidance, topography and forest structure shape territory selection of a forest bird
Hypothesis | Variables in model | LL | K | AICc | ĪAICc | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forest structure | ||||||
(a) Ground variables | Number of tussocks, year, number of tussocks x year | ā22.315 | 7 | 60.277 | 0 | 0.202 |
Ā | Number of tussocks, number of bushes2 | ā22.774 | 7 | 61.194 | 0.917 | 0.128 |
Ā | Number of tussocks, number of bushes2, cover of herb layer | ā21.562 | 8 | 61.273 | 0.996 | 0.123 |
Ā | Number of tussocks, year, number of tussocks x year, number of bushes | ā21.798 | 8 | 61.745 | 1.468 | 0.097 |
Ā | Number of tussocks, year, number of tussocks x year, cover of herb layer | ā21.986 | 8 | 62.122 | 1.845 | 0.080 |
Ā | ā¦ | Ā | Ā | Ā | Ā | Ā |
Ā | Null | ā31.868 | 4 | 72.299 | 12.022 | 0.000 |
(b) Tree variables | Number of trees2, tree dbh2, tree species diversity2 | ā17.092 | 10 | 57.569 | 0 | 0.091 |
Ā | Number of trees, tree species diversity2 | ā21.187 | 7 | 58.020 | 0.452 | 0.072 |
Ā | Number of trees, tree dbh2, tree species diversity2 | ā18.652 | 9 | 58.031 | 0.462 | 0.072 |
Ā | Number of trees2 | ā22.514 | 6 | 58.246 | 0.677 | 0.065 |
Ā | Number of trees, tree species diversity2, tree dbh | ā20.060 | 8 | 58.269 | 0.701 | 0.064 |
Ā | Number of trees, tree dbh2, tree species diversity2, sky visibility | ā17.695 | 10 | 58.776 | 1.207 | 0.050 |
Ā | Number of trees2, tree dbh2, tree species diversity2, sky visibility | ā16.336 | 11 | 58.797 | 1.229 | 0.049 |
Ā | Number of trees2, tree species diversity2 | ā20.364 | 8 | 58.877 | 1.308 | 0.047 |
Ā | Number of trees2, tree dbh2, tree species diversity2, sky visibility2 | ā15.234 | 12 | 59.420 | 1.852 | 0.036 |
Ā | ā¦ | Ā | Ā | Ā | Ā | Ā |
Ā | Null | ā31.868 | 4 | 72.299 | 14.730 | 0.000 |
(c) Tree species composition | Proportion conifers | ā29.723 | 5 | 70.303 | 0 | 0.265 |
Ā | Proportion conifers, proportion beech | ā29.533 | 6 | 72.283 | 1.981 | 0.098 |
Ā | Proportion conifers, proportion other deciduous trees | ā29.539 | 6 | 72.295 | 1.992 | 0.098 |
Ā | ā¦ | Ā | Ā | Ā | Ā | Ā |
Ā | Null | ā31.868 | 4 | 72.299 | 1.996 | 0.098 |
Rodent-avoidance | Null | ā31.868 | 4 | 72.299 | 0 | 0.575 |
Ā | Rodent numbers | ā31.023 | 5 | 72.903 | 0.605 | 0.425 |
Disturbance | Distance to forest edge, distance to path2 | ā20.719 | 7 | 57.084 | 0 | 0.694 |
Ā | Distance to forest edge2, distance to path2 | ā20.453 | 8 | 59.055 | 1.97 | 0.259 |
Ā | ā¦ | Ā | Ā | Ā | Ā | Ā |
Ā | Null | ā31.868 | 4 | 72.299 | 15.214 | 0.000 |
Topography | Slope steepness2, elevation2, southness, eastness | ā13.541 | 10 | 50.467 | 0 | 0.692 |
Ā | ā¦ | Ā | Ā | Ā | Ā | Ā |
Ā | Null | ā31.868 | 4 | 72.299 | 21.832 | 0.000 |
Across hypothesesa | Slope steepness, distance to forest edge, number of trees | ā14.985 | 7 | 45.457 | 0 | 0.734 |
Ā | ā¦ | Ā | Ā | Ā | Ā | Ā |
Ā | Null | ā31.868 | 4 | 72.299 | 26.842 | 0.000 |