Skip to main content

Table 5 Mean relative bias for 10, 25, 50 and 100 samples/simulation for each density estimator for each spatial pattern (see Table 3)

From: A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets

 

Sample size

Sample size

 

RBIAS

Rank

Estimator

10

25

50

100

10

25

50

100

 

Uniform (n = 5)

AO2Q

0.222

0.225

0.225

0.225

8

8

8

8

AO3Q

0.205

0.207

0.207

0.207

7

7

7

7

BDAV3

-0.095

-0.136

-0.147

-0.154

4

4

5

6

KM2P

-0.136

-0.145

-0.148

-0.150

6

6

6

5

KMP

-0.130

-0.141

-0.145

-0.148

5

5

4

4

OD2C

-0.051

-0.077

-0.091

-0.097

1

1

2

2

OD3C

-0.070

-0.091

-0.101

-0.106

2

3

3

3

VAT

-0.074

-0.080

-0.081

-0.083

3

2

1

1

 

Poisson (n = 2)

AO2Q

0.324

0.324

0.326

0.325

8

8

8

8

AO3Q

0.295

0.295

0.296

0.296

7

7

7

7

BDAV3

0.073

0.014

-0.002

-0.009

6

2

2

2

KM2P

-0.037

-0.050

-0.052

-0.052

3

4

4

3

KMP

-0.070

-0.089

-0.092

-0.094

5

6

6

6

OD2C

-0.045

-0.065

-0.070

-0.071

4

5

5

5

OD3C

-0.031

-0.047

-0.051

-0.052

2

3

3

4

VAT

0.019

0.005

0.000

-0.003

1

1

1

1

 

Clumped (n = 10)

AO2Q

-0.079

-0.082

-0.081

-0.080

2

3

3

3

AO3Q

-0.063

-0.065

-0.065

-0.064

1

2

2

2

BDAV3

0.080

-0.008

-0.036

-0.049

3

1

1

1

KM2P

-0.319

-0.325

-0.333

-0.337

4

4

4

4

KMP

-0.350

-0.377

-0.386

-0.391

5

5

5

5

OD2C

-0.410

-0.435

-0.444

-0.447

8

8

8

8

OD3C

-0.376

-0.399

-0.407

-0.410

7

7

7

7

VAT

-0.365

-0.387

-0.393

-0.396

6

6

6

6

 

All (n = 17)

AO2Q

0.055

0.054

0.055

0.055

2

2

1

1

AO3Q

0.056

0.056

0.056

0.056

3

3

2

2

BDAV3

0.033

-0.039

-0.061

-0.072

1

1

3

3

KM2P

-0.227

-0.241

-0.246

-0.249

4

4

4

4

KMP

-0.254

-0.276

-0.282

-0.286

7

7

7

7

OD2C

-0.266

-0.290

-0.300

-0.304

8

8

8

8

OD3C

-0.248

-0.270

-0.278

-0.281

6

6

6

6

VAT

-0.236

-0.253

-0.257

-0.260

5

5

5

5